SMOKING GUN PROOF
THE ILLUMINATI PLAN TO ATTACK ON 9/11 AND BEYOND WAS WELL KNOWN AS FAR BACK AS 1995. [Steve Jackson's 'Illuminati' card game predicts / causes 9/11. Sure.]
Category > 9/11
272812main_image_1171_1600-1200.jpg (JPEG Image, 1600×1200 pixels) – Scaled (71%)
Astronaut Frank Culbertson photographs ground zero on 9/11 while in the International Space Station. “What a frightening sight this must have been. How many sci-fi shows and movies are there, where the crew of a spaceship watches helplessly as their planet is attacked?” – John in Canada at nasawatch.com
272812main_image_1171_1600-1200.jpg (JPEG Image, 1600×1200 pixels) – Scaled (71%)
We need more Muslim babies… then we can take over Britain | The Sun
“It may be by pure conversion that Britain will become an Islamic state. We may never need to conquer it from the outside.”[This at a UK Muslim memorial on 9/11.]
We need more Muslim babies… then we can take over Britain | The Sun
No consensus on who was behind Sept 11 – global poll | World | Reuters
The survey of 16,063 people in 17 nations found majorities in only nine countries believe al Qaeda was behind the attacks on New York and Washington that killed about 3,000 people in 2001.
No consensus on who was behind Sept 11 – global poll | World | Reuters
Dhimmi Watch: U.S. court exonerates Saudis from lawsuit filed by relatives of 9/11 victims
As well they should! After all, the Saudis are only responsible for supplying the hate-and-destroy-all-infidels educational curriculum, “Wahhabism” to every mosque (and CAIR), 15 of the 19 September 11 hijackers (as well as Osama bin Laden), and mega petro-dollars to jihadis around the globe.
Dhimmi Watch: U.S. court exonerates Saudis from lawsuit filed by relatives of 9/11 victims
VDARE.com: Blog Articles » United States Of Lamerica
It’s been 80 months and the government is now kicking around the idea of profiling
Trevor Blake: Two Ways of Funding the Taliban
I can think of two ways to fund the Taliban. First, you can do it by accident. The Evening Echo reported on 13 April 2008: “Afghanistan’s intelligence chief said today a coalition helicopter accidentally dropped food and weapons in a remote area of southern Afghanistan where Taliban fighters recovered the supplies. Amrullah Saleh, the head of Afghanistan’s intelligence service, told members of parliament the supplies were intended for police at a checkpoint in the southern province of Zabul.” That’s one way to fund the Taliban, by accident.
The other way to fund the Taliban is to do so deliberately. The Los Angeles Times reported on 22 May 2001: “Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this nation still takes seriously. That’s the message sent with the recent gift of $43 million to the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan, the most virulent anti-American violators of human rights in the world today. [...] Never mind that Osama bin Laden still operates the leading anti-American terror operation from his base in Afghanistan, from which, among other crimes, he launched two bloody attacks on American embassies in Africa in 1998.”
Say now, didn’t something happen involving Osama bin Laden a few months after the Bush administration gave the Taliban $43 million? I can’t remember. Anyway, there are at least two ways to fund the Taliban. The Bush administration has been involved in both.
Malcolm Moore: Pope will pray for terrorists at Ground Zero
The Pope will pray for the redemption of Islamic terrorists when he visits the site of the September 11 attacks in New York next week. The pontiff will call for terrorists to convert to Christianity, saying: “Turn to Your way of love those whose hearts and minds are consumed with hatred. God of understanding, overwhelmed by the magnitude of this tragedy, we seek your light and guidance”.
The prayer is likely to further incense the Muslim world, which has already attacked the Pope for publicly converting Magdi Allam, a journalist and one of Italy’s most high-profile Muslims, at Easter.
[Article continues at link. I don't whisper magic spells to an invisible monster that lives in the sky. But for lack of a better word, my prayer at the site of the World Trade Center would be for all of humanity to abandon religion. And as pointed out at JihadWatch, Muslim apologists will have to juggle the contradictory claims that the Pope has insulted Muslims yet the 9/11 hijackers weren't really Muslims because Islam is the Religion of Peace. - Trevor Blake]
Pope will pray for terrorists at Ground Zero – Telegraph
The pontiff will call for terrorists to convert to Christianity. [I'd say give up superstition altogether]
Truthout – Bush Covered Up Saudi Involvement in 9/11
the White House has suppressed convincing evidence that the Saudi royal family supported at least two of the hijackers.
Gerald Posner: The CIA's Destroyed Interrogation Tapes and the Saudi-Pakistani 9/11 Connection – Politics on The Huffington Post
Zubaydah laid out details of how he and the al Qaeda hierarchy had been supported at high levels inside the Saudi and Pakistan governments.
WTNH.com – Atheist sign sparks controversy
Two sides of the display feature the Twin Towers, framed by the words “Imagine No Religion.”
Vee Haf Vays of Making You Talk NONSENSE § Unqualified Offerings
Higazy/”Egyptian Radio” case.
Vee Haf Vays of Making You Talk NONSENSE § Unqualified Offerings
Agence France Presse: Bush certifies Saudi Arabia as 'war on terror' ally
US President George W. Bush certified Saudi Arabia as an anti-terrorism ally on Friday, weeks after a top US Treasury official sharply criticized the kingdom’s record. Bush’s move came in a memorandum to US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, required under US law to free up aid from Washington to Riyadh, that the White House released to reporters.
“I hereby certify that Saudi Arabia is cooperating with efforts to combat international terrorism and that the proposed assistance will help facilitate that effort,” the president said.
[Article continues at link. Why might Bush consider Saudi Arabia a partner in peace? It is because the Saudi royal family and intelligence service supported Osama bin Ladin? Is it because wealthy Saudi businessmen funded Osama bin Ladin? Is it because the Saudi government favored the construction company owned by 'The Binladen Group?" Is it because rich Saudis bankrolled the civil war in Bosnia? Is it because after capturing Osama bin Ladin, Saudi Arabia let him go? Is it because the Saudi embassy paid mercenaries to attack US soldiers in Bosnia? Is it because Osama bin Ladin lists a charity tied to the Saudi government as a main financier? Is it because Osama bin Ladin met with the Saudi government? Repeatedly? Is it because Saudi multimillionaires funded terrorism? Is it because the Saudi government sent large sums of money to 9/11 front groups? Is it because Saudi Arabia made deals with Al-Qaeda? Is it because the Saudi government was the largest financier of Al-Qaeda? And of the civil war in Bosnia? Is it because the US government requested documents about Osama bin Ladin from the Saudi Arabian government, and they didn't deliver? And instead shielded bin Ladin? Is it because the Saudi government funded Hamas? Is it because Saudi Arabia recognized the Taliban government? Is it because the Saudi government gave $15,000 to Osama Basnan, who gave it to two 9/11 hijackers? Is it because the Saudi government directly gave 9/11 hijackers money in Amsterdam? Is it because 9/11 hijackers made regular phone calls to Saudi government officials? Many calls? Is it because the French established links between Al-Qaeda and Saudi Arabia? Is it because the Saudis and the bin Ladins funded terrorism in the Philippines? Is it because most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi Arabians?
Or is it because the bin Ladin family helped bail out George W. Bush when his company Harken went under? Is it because there are links between Saudi money and the Bush family? Is it because the US government turned away documents linking the Saudi government to terrorism? Repeatedly? Is it because CIA operatives were told not to investigate terrorism in Saudi Arabia? Is it because the bin Ladin family were declared of
f limits to US intelligence investigation? Repeatedly? Often? Is it because the CIA preferred to join Saudi Arabia in bribing the Taliban instead of seizing bin Ladin? Is it because the US government knew Saudi Arabian royalty were funding Osama bin Ladin and did nothing? Is it because the Bush family met with the bin Ladin family? Repeatedly? Is it because the US Treasury department was blocked from freezing the assets of Al-Qaeda financiers in Saudi Arabia? Is it because the US expedited 9/11 hijackers getting their passports in Saudi Arabia? Even if they were on intelligence watch lists? Is it because the CIA met with Osama bin Ladin? Is it because Saudi Arabia threatened to end its alliance with the USA? Is it because Bush tried to make nice with the Saudis after they did that but paused after 9/11? Is it because three 9/11 hijackers stayed at the same hotel as a senior Saudi official?
The final word comes from the same source as all of the above, the Complete 9/11 Timeline produced by the Cooperative Research History Commons: "FBI counterterrorism expert John O'Neill privately discusses White House obstruction in his bin Laden investigation. O'Neill says, 'The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were US oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it.' He adds, 'All the answers, everything needed to dismantle Osama bin Laden's organization, can be found in Saudi Arabia.' O'Neill also believes the White House is obstructing his investigation of bin Laden because they are still keeping the idea of a pipeline deal with the Taliban open." I think this is all the conspiracy theory we need to know what happened and why. - Trevor Blake]
Trevor Blake: Peaceful Protest after Amsterdam Attacks
Police in the Dutch city of Amsterdam say several peaceful protests were held in the sixth night of memorials after officers shot a Moroccan man dead. The 22-year old was killed after entering a police station where he stabbed two police officers. Eleven ‘not in our name’ protests have been held this week in the Slotervaart district of Amsterdam, which is mainly populated by immigrants. Police said that a group of about 35 young people were behind the honoring of the attacked police officers.
“There is a lot of police in the streets. This is the work of a majority who take don’t want the violence of extremists associated with their religion of peace,” said a spokesman. The dead Moroccan man, identified as Bilal B, had been receiving treatment for psychiatric problems. He had been questioned over contact with Islamic extremists who were linked to the murder of film maker Theo van Gogh in 2004. About 1m of the Netherlands’ 16m population are Muslims.
[None of the above actually happened. The actual article is to be found at link. Muslims are willing to kill each other and anyone else all day every day over perceived insults from non-Muslims, but they are largely silent when it comes time to be accountable for their own actions. What would the world be like if just as many Muslims peacefully marched in the street saying that 9/11 was not done in their name as there are Muslims killing people over comics and movies? Do Muslims march for peace, ever, anywhere? - Trevor Blake]
Spiderman trailer
Prior to 9/11, this was the trailer for the movie Spiderman.
