Category > periodical

Trevor Blake: Introduction to OVO 16 ANTICHRIST

20 August 2010 » In atheist, christianity, education, islam, judaism, mormon, ovo, periodical, race, religion, satanism, science, sex, slavery, socialism, subud, theocracy, trevorblake, watchtower, zine

OUTLAW CHRISTIANITY! DEATH TO ALL CHRISTIANS!

The above does not reflect the intention of OVO, and in fact stands opposite to it. The above is provided to feed the presuppositions of those who will not actually read this issue of OVO. Any review of this issue that quotes the words above is likely to have been written by someone who never read beyond them to learn what OVO actually states. This issue of OVO has a purpose, but the likelihood that it will be misrepresented is great enough that a clear statement of what the purpose is not is in order.

OVO does not advocate the criminalization of Christianity. Existing criminal law suffices to address what is harmful, and law is among the least appropriate means of addressing what is merely mistaken. Christians deserve equal sanction by the law, and voluntary and informed activities among consenting adults (including religion) should not be outlawed.
OVO does not advocate the murder of Christians except in self-defense. Because of the potential for legal error, capital punishment is immoral in all cases. War and murder are immoral in all cases except in self-defense. Except in self-defense, it is always immoral to kill (including killing Christians).

OVO does not advocate the replacement of the Christian God with another God, a Goddess, a pantheon of deities, nature worship, or similar substitution. OVO does not advocate worship, be it of the Christian God or any other. To any reader who uses OVO to build up their own superstition: your faith is equally contemptible.

OVO does not criticize Christianity because it does not understand it. Many years research went into this issue, and along the way misunderstandings about Christianity (whether in its favor or against it) were abandoned. OVO criticizes Christianity not because it does not understand it, but because it is worthy of criticism.

OVO does not criticize Christianity because the editor had a traumatic experience with Christianity. The editor had a generally positive experience with Christianity while growing up and has Christian friends today. It is a silent admission of defeat that Christians use this psychological, secular explanation for why someone might criticize their superstition. The editor came to reject Christianity the old fashioned way: by reading the Bible.

OVO is not critical of Christianity because the editor is possessed by Satan, demons or evil spirits. Such ghosts have never existed.

OVO does not criticize Christianity because it is a socialist publication. OVO is not a socialist publication.

OVO does not criticize Christianity because Christianity is false. Christianity is false, but that is not in itself sufficient reason to advocate that it wither away. There are many non-fiction books, films, plays, poems and recordings that are also false but serve to inspire humanity. But these false stories do not claim to be true, are not taught to impressionable children as true, and are not used to support legislation that meddles in the affairs of non-Christians. No one is arguing that the epics of Homer be taught as history; no one is legislating that Aesop’s fables be posted in courtrooms. These stories, though false, serve to inspire those who seek them out and are rightly preserved. It is the secular power of Christianity that is the problem, not merely its falsehood. Christianity does not attempt to identify and lessen its falsehoods: it revels in them as ‘tests of faith.’ Christianity is holding back science and art, culture and philosophy, tools that actually can and actually have improved humanity’s lot in an indifferent Universe.

OVO does not criticize Christianity because it is a good religion perverted to bad ends. It is much more the case that a few good people (Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, perhaps) have perverted the bad religion of Christianity to good ends. All the good done in the name of Christianity could and does occur through entirely secular means. What remains distinctly Christian if such duplication of labor is removed? Threats of eternal damnation, denial of the pleasures and wonders of this short life, confusion and deception. When Christianity has supported individual rights it has done so only after a ‘revelation’ that (a) goes against its own history and (b) miraculously is in harmony with contemporary public opinion. For example, many Christians opposed slavery in the United States; but many more supported slavery and did so for much longer. Even today the Bible contains many passages supporting slavery and not one passage condemning it. Christianity is a slave religion, a misogynist religion, a queer-killing religion, a nonsense religion, but good people keep twisting their bad faith to good ends. Wouldn’t it be better to just do good deeds without wasted efforts to placate an invisible monster that lives in the sky?

OVO does not criticize Christianity to criticize individual Christians. It is often the case that an attack on a person’s unconsidered beliefs is perceived as an attack on their person. If a person’s beliefs are profoundly unconsidered, to merely state that one holds differing beliefs is perceived as an attack. For example, Christians who see other superstitions get equal time in the eyes of the law sometimes complain that their freedom of religion is under attack. Those who hold considered beliefs are secure when challenged and (hopefully) willing to admit error. Those who hold unconsidered beliefs, who repeat what they have been told without deliberation, are more likely to confuse who they are with what they believe. Christianity, like all religions, encourages strong belief but also encourages a lack of consideration. Posturing, bullying and stubbornness are substitutes for consideration of belief among most Christians.

OVO does not criticize Christianity because its claims contradict the evidence of our senses, science, history, archeology, astronomy, mathematics, common sense and the like. It is true that Christianity is incompatible with all of these, but science progresses by way of challenges to all our claims. If Christianity challenges the evidence of our senses, all the better: let the challenges be considered and considered again. If the Bible contradicts science, science can be tested to see if the Bible has a better explanation for reality. Where the Bible holds true, the Bible holds true. Where the Bible is found to be false, it should either be re-written or re-classified as folk tales. Resolving contradictions between the Bible and the evidence of our senses can be of value to us all, and so the contradictions between the Bible and the evidence of our senses are not in themselves why the Bible should be criticized. Internal contradictions in the Bible, and holding on to falsehood when falsehood has been identified, are worthy of the greatest of criticisms.

OVO does not criticize Christianity as an argument for atheism. The editor is preparing an argument for atheism that is distinct from this argument against Christianity.

OVO does not criticize Christianity because Jesus Christ was a good person whose followers have gone astray, or because we do not have the secret teachings of Jesus, or because Jesus was a complex person with both good and bad qualities. Jesus never existed.

In 1991, the editor published A Call to Heresy on a BBS in Knoxville, Tennessee USA. The document found its way onto BBS’ around the world as well as other formats, including an Internet domain in Hong Kong and a CD-ROM of public domain texts published by Palm Computers. Various editions of the text can be found on the Internet today. Some of the research done for that text has found a new home here in OVO 16 AntiChrist.

OVO criticizes the Bible. Some Christians say that it is an error to overly attend to what the Bible says, and one should rely on the Bible as inspiration rather than fact. But the Bible itself makes claims of perfection, and so taking it at its word in claims of perfection are as justified as any other perspective; perhaps more justified than some ‘inspired’ interpretations. If any interpretation of the Bible is as good as any other, then Christians in no way can distance themselves from the worst among them. Having failed to amend the contradictions, atrocities and absurdities in the Bible with over two thousand years to do so, it is reasonable to conclude that the Bible is considered factual among Christians. Some Christians (called Dominionists or Fundamentalists or Conservatives or the Christian Right) are explicit in their claim that the Bible is factual, while the rest hold it to be factual but requiring ‘interpretation’ (often by way of asking the reader to simply ignore parts of the Bible).

But this issue of OVO does not limit itself to criticisms of the Bible. The Roman Catholic Church claims a history pre-dating the Bible. Martin Luther, founder of Protestant Christianity, wrote inspired texts. The Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints and the Watchtower Society claim to have Christian revelations in modern times. All of these Christians are well deserving of criticism and contempt.

There are a set number of responses offered by Christians when confronted with their own beliefs. The first and most common is to be told that these Bible verses have been taken out of context. It is claimed that the verses surrounding these quotes give them a meaning other than their apparent meaning. If this is the case it will be easy to demonstrate; full citations for each quote are given throughout. The reader is encouraged to read the Bible. There is no more sure path to rejecting Christianity than understanding it. Some claim that the contexts of the times change how we should understand the Bible. But does the Bible say it is relevant only until the time of Job (the last time God speaks directly to humanity), or does it claim to be relevant to all times? Some claim that one translation of the Bible offers a more accurate account than another, but existing fragmentary early Christian texts contain their own contradictions, atrocities and absurdities.

The second common reply made by Christians when confronted with their own beliefs is that the Bible, God, Jesus and the rest are not to be understood by reason in the way math or science is. Christianity is to be understood by faith, by the heart, by the spirit, by the soul. Therefore any apparent contradictions, atrocities or absurdities should be ignored because those are all ‘reason’ and not ‘faith.’ But there is no ‘alternative to reason’ as faith is said to be. One can hope, one can wish, one can pretend and ignore, one can scream or run away or kill one’s critics, but none of these are alternatives to reason. Even if there were an alternative to reason, how is the ‘feeling’ that Christianity is true (and all other religions false) different from the ‘feeling’ that Islam is true (and all other religions are false)? Why is it that Christian ‘feelings’ are so regional – does God not inspire such ‘feelings’ everywhere equally? Why don’t children have that ‘feeling’ until an adult tells them to say they do, and why do adults spend so much effort making sure that ‘feeling’ is planted in children?

All religions claim to be the only true religion. Even the ecumenical religions claim to be the only true religion, by claiming that the non-ecumenical religions are false. But since all religions contradict each other at most only one can be the only true religion. Since all religions by definition put themselves outside what can be demonstrated as true, it would be unjust to establish any religion as secular law because the likelihood of error would be too great. Suppose Mithrism became the law of the United States when actually it was Ah Pook that was the real living God? Those countries that have a legal assumption of atheism serve freedom the most. At times this has been the case in the United States, where OVO originates. Christianity threatens the legal presupposition of atheism in the USA, necessitating this issue of OVO. Christianity is the superstition behind the US support of Israel, the war in Iraq, lack of access to Plan B and a vaccine for two strains of cancer-causing HPV, the removal of science from public education, the ongoing imprisonment of the West Memphis Three (among others), blue laws, laws forbidding atheists from holding elected office and more. Reform from within should occur in Christianity. Civil discourse should occur between Christians and non-Christians. But should Christianity elect to ignore the opportunities of positive reinforcement, let it learn the sting of negative reinforcement. OVO is not reforming Christianity from within, nor is it a civil discourse. It is an attack – using only Christianity’s own beliefs as weapons. When Mithrism or the faithful of Ah Pook establish their superstition as law in the USA, they will be equally worthy of criticism. Readers in countries where Islam or Judaism are the majority superstition are encouraged to make similar efforts.

This issue of OVO advocates the withering away of Christianity through reason and scorn. Reason alone withers Christianity to a hostile party guest that has long overstayed his welcome; scorn provide us with laughter and satisfaction as we show him to the door. Perhaps reason alone, or reason and compassion, might be a more noble endeavor. But any belief that cannot withstand a little mockery is perhaps not worth holding in the first place.

Subject religious organizations to the same requirements as secular non-profit organizations: demonstrate they perform a quantifiable public good to receive tax-exempt status. Do not donate any funds, labor or resources to Christian organizations: there are secular equivalents to any Christian organization for those who seek to aid others. Do not vote for politicians who make their Christianity a part of their platform. Oppose ‘faith based’ funding and theocratic laws. Learn more about Christianity than the Christians themselves. Confront Christians with their own claims and history.

OVO is fortunate to originate in the United States, where Christianity and other superstitions may be legally practiced and criticized. The United Kingdom, Holland, Sweden, Italy, Turkey, Norway, Canada and other countries forbid criticism of religion as a form of ‘hate crime,’ while China, North Korea and other countries forbid religion as a form of ‘thought crime.’ In the United States religion may be both practiced and criticized – for now. If Christianity continues to become the state religion of the United States, this may not be the case much longer.

OVO is a tool kit to disabuse the reader of Christianity.

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Case Against Tax Exemption for Religious Organizations in Oregon

20 August 2010 » In buddhism, christianity, hindu, islam, judaism, mormon, ovo, periodical, portland, religion, santeria, satanism, scientology, subud, theocracy, trevorblake, watchtower, zine

This essay makes the case against tax exemption for religious organizations in Oregon. The amount of revenue lost as well as the harm caused by religious organizations is not compensated for by the social good they are alleged to provide (this alleged social good being the justification for their tax exempt status).

Tax exemption for religious organizations in Oregon brings about three problems for Oregonians. First, there is no definition of religion to differentiate ‘real’ religious organizations from ‘fake’ ones, thus making any decision for or against tax exemption on the part of the government arbitrary. Second, religious organizations are not compelled to make contributions to their community that are comparable to the amount they are awarded in taxes breaks, nor is there any effort or means to hold them accountable for aiding the community. Third, the revenue needs of Oregon could be met by taxing religious organizations at only a fraction of the rate other organizations are taxed.

It is helpful to delineate what is under discussion in any argument. In this case, the topics under discussion are Oregon, taxes exemption and religion. Oregon is the state to the North of California and Nevada, to the South of Washington, to the West of Idaho and with a Western boundary of the Pacific Ocean. Tax exemption means that the agencies in question are not compelled to pay taxes. The definitions for Oregon and tax exemption are easy to find, confirm, and understand. But the search for a definition of religion is doomed to failure.

There is no legal definition of what a religion is, be it on the international level, the national level or the state level. Although many nations define religion as something deserving of political protection, there is no legal definition of what a religion is in international law [1].

There is also no legal definition of what a religion is in United States law. The First Amendment of the Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that the religion of a US citizen cannot be used to deny them public accommodation, equal protection under the law, segregation in public education or college education, the right to vote, or employment [2]. While the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ensure protection of religion, neither define what it is they are protecting. The United States has never offered a definition what a religion is, although it has offered a definition of what a religion is not. In Thomas vs. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, the Supreme Court determined that “religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection [3].” In the eyes of the law, a religion is anything that declares itself a religion.

There is no legal definition of what a religion is in Oregon law. ORS 128.620 (4) states a “religious organization means any organized church or group organized for the purpose of divine worship, religious teaching, or other directly ancillary purposes [4].” ORS 307.140 states property owned or being purchased by religious organizations is exempt from taxation [5]. ORS 65.001 (39) states that a religious group “is designated a religious corporation by a statute or is organized primarily or exclusively for religious purposes.” The Department of Revenues states that exemption from property tax is available for any religious group that has a constitution, bylaws, or charter which states its mission and purpose [6]. Religious organizations in Oregon are clearly given exemption from property tax, and are clearly expected to ‘be religious.’ But there is no legal definition of what a religion is or how to ‘be religious’ in Oregon law.

Whether it be international law, United States law or Oregon law, there is no legal definition of what a religion is. What if legal sanctions and prohibitions for other issues were left similarly vague? For better and for worse, there are legal definitions to who is and is not a Native American; what is and is not an endangered species; which chemicals are and are not legal to ingest. If there were no definition of who is a Native American, anyone could collect federal benefits reserved for Native Americans. If there were no definition of what an endangered species is, any species could be declared no longer endangered and hunted to extinction. If there were no definition of who is authorized to sell morphine, anyone who would like to make some fast money would do so. The reason legal definitions exist is so that laws may be fairly applied to all, and so that exemptions from the law may be justified. But a religious group is a religious group merely because it claims to be a religious group. Religions exempt themselves from definition, aside from the definition of ‘that which is tax exempt.’

Because there is no legal definition for religion in Oregon, there is no way to determine if religious tax exemptions are being fairly applied. Some religious organizations may be tax exempt but not deservedly so, while other religious organizations may not be tax exempt and deserve tax exemption. There is no way to determine if religious tax exemptions are being fairly granted to all applicants because there is no way to determine which applicant is ‘being religious’ and which is not. Whatever ‘being religious’ means, religious organizations are exempt from paying taxes. This includes taxes related to their property, businesses, income, and donations.

The justification offered for religious tax exemption is similar to that of secular groups that qualify for non-profit status (501c3). Secular non-profit organizations earn their tax exempt status by providing services that might otherwise be provided by the state, such as housing or medical care. Since the state does not have to pay for these services, no taxes are gathered from organizations that offer such services. Since the perceived need for taxes is thereby reduced, secular non-profit organizations can justify their tax-exempt status.

But there is an important difference between the tax-exempt status of secular organizations and the tax-exempt status of religious organizations. Secular non-profit organizations are held accountable for their work. They must demonstrate that the service they provide is necessary, that they have provided that service, that the service they provided was taken advantage of, and that the cost of lost taxes is less than the benefit of the services provided. If a secular non-profit organization cannot demonstrate each of these characteristics, they do not retain their tax-exempt status.

The standards that secular non-profit organizations are held to makes them very different from religious tax-exempt organizations. Religious tax-exempt organizations are not held to these standards or to any other standard. A religious organization may deliver food to the hungry, offer shelter to the homeless and counseling to the troubled – or they may do none of these things, or it may do these things to a standard far outside accepted norms (such as offering “prayer” as a substitute for medical care or counseling). Religious groups are exempt from taxes whether or not they serve their community and lessen the tax burden. There is no legal obligation on a religious group’s part to demonstrate they have delivered food, shelter or other tangible services; there is no legal obligation on a religious group’s part to do anything to retain their tax-exempt status other than filing or re-filing the proper forms. It is not possible to measure measures how much religion Oregonians need, how much religion religious organizations provide, how many people take advantage of religion, whether one form of religion is more beneficial than any other, or whether or not religion is cost effective. While is it possible to state how many people claim religious affiliation, it is not possible to state what that means. It is not possible to determine if a two-year-old just as religious as an adult. It is not possible to legislate how often or in what way a group must be religious to qualify for tax exempt status. Because there is no oversight to determine how much a religious group serves its community, there is no justification for tax exempt status for religious organizations in Oregon.

Oregon law does not state what religion is. Oregon law is also not consistent in when individuals are exempt from legal punishment due to religion. Sometimes activities are forbidden by law irregardless of religion, other times they are allowed if religion is said to be involved. In the case of Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon vs. Smith it was determined that the state of Oregon is not compelled to allow the use of peyote [7]. Although peyote has been a part of Native American religions for centuries, and although the plaintiffs were themselves Native Americans and were using peyote for what they claimed were religious reasons, the state Supreme Court determined they were not entitled to unemployment compensation after being fired due to using peyote. The legal injunction against peyote use trumped their religious claims. This is an example of an activity being illegal whether or not it was ‘religious.’

Conversely, Oregon law provides immunity to many charges if the crime occurred as religion. These crimes have included homicide by abuse or neglect, first and second degree manslaughter, criminal mistreatment, requirements for children to wear a bicycle helmet, and nonsupport of children. Until recently, all of these crimes could be excused if the defendant claims they were committed as religion [8].

All newborns in Oregon are given a drop of vitamin K by law, but parents can prevent their children from receiving protection against spontaneous hemorrhaging for religious reasons.

The Followers of Christ Church in Clackamas County took advantage of religious exemption for murder by allowing nearly eighty children to die since the 1950s from treatable medical conditions. In over half of these deaths, the state did not attempt to establish the cause of death, the record was lost or their deaths were listed as due to ‘natural causes.’ Even when an Oregon medical examiner brought these deaths to the attention of the District Attorney’s office, the prosecutor declined to file charges. In the words of Rita Swan, “a parent may be beating or torturing a child, but if he or she can show that the child was prayed for, criminal charges must be dismissed [9].” Oregon House Bill 2494 revised criminal exemptions for parents who treat children only with prayer in 1999, after hearing opposing testimony by Oregon churches [10]. While child sacrifice in Oregon now carries some consequences, other criminal exemptions such as not requiring a religious child to wear a bicycle helmet remain [11]. These are a examples of an otherwise illegal activity being legal by calling it ‘religious.’

One of the larger religious organization in Oregon is the Archdiocese of Portland. The Archdiocese of Portland is under the direct orders of the Roman Catholic Church, led by the Pope of Rome. In 1962, Pope John XXIII gave his approval to a document outlining the policy of the Roman Catholic Church in the event of child abuse by clergy. The policy was to keep child abuse by clergy secret and to transfer abusive priests to new parishes. The policy itself was to be kept secret but was revealed in 2003. The policy has never been retracted [12]; in fact, the current Pope stated in 2001 that the policy was still in effect [13]. More than one hundred and sixty nine victims of clerical child abuse have sued the Archdiocese of Portland for child abuse, and more than $53,000,000.00 has been assigned to settlements so far. While the Archdiocese of Portland filed for and received permission to delay paying its victims, it did have the funds to make building upgrades costing $1.6 million dollars [14]. The Archdiocese of Portland is estimated to own between $300,000,000 and $500,000,000 in property, none of which is taxed. It also owns special-purpose funds, investment funds, and loan funds, none of which are taxed. In 2003 its revenue was no less than and perhaps greater than $8.2 million, none of which was taxed [15]. The Archdiocese of Portland is only one out of 6,862 religious organizations claiming ORS 307.140 tax exemption in the state [16]. To quote the Oregonian, “The Catholic Church operates not by secular law, but by church law [17].”

Religious organizations in Oregon are not compelled to follow the same standards of education and employment as any other educator or employer in the state. Fundamental facts of nature which are part of the basic curriculum for any other school in the state may be omitted or deliberately misrepresented in religious schools. Any secular employer who hires and fires based on gender, ethnicity, sexuality, marital status or beliefs is subject to legal sanctions, but if the employer is religious they may hire and fire at will are protected by law in doing so.

Non-profit organizations (both secular and religious) are forbidden from endorsing political candidates. But some religious tax-exempt groups want to have their cake and eat it too. The Sonrise Church of Hillsboro lost its tax exempt status after partisan campaigning on its property [18]. The Christian Coalition has published the same sort of voting guides that cost the Sonrise Church its tax exempt status [19]. The New Hope Community Church of Clackamas has held partisan campaign meetings on its property [20]. The campaign to elect George W. Bush solicited the support of hundreds of religious organizations [21]. To further blur the line between state and superstition, the House of Representatives has initiated a bill that will merely fine religious organization that engage in partisan politics rather than revoke their tax exempt status [22]. Religious organizations can now avail themselves to federal funds through George W. Bush’s ‘faith based initiatives’ law – but apparently this money is made available mainly to Christian organizations, as few other religious organizations that have applied have received such funds. Under faith based funding, tax dollars can go to agencies that refuse to hire or serve minorities, women, homosexuals or anyone else for any reason.

In 1998 the Audits Division of the State of Oregon Department of Revenue conducted an audit of property tax exemptions. It determined that among religious organizations claiming tax exempt status under ORS 307.140, the sum of $2,010,492,000.00 was lost in tax year 1995-1996 [23]. This figure represents only revenues lost from property taxes, and does not include other lost forms of revenues connected to employment, businesses, museums and other sources of income for religious organizations. The audit states that 41 of the 154 organizations audited that were granted tax exempt status did not even meet the minimal state standards for tax exempt status (whatever those might be). The audit does not specifically state how many of these organizations were tax exempt under ORS 307.140. but the fact that one third of the organizations that claimed (and were granted) exemption totaling seventeen percent of $170.9 billion dollars in property taxes [24] were not qualified to do so suggests that Oregon religious tax exemption law is in dire need of supervision and revision [25]. Among other recommendations, the audit suggested that Oregon needs a clear definition of what a religion is to be able to fairly evaluate applications for ORS 307.140 tax exempt status [26]. This recommendation was not mentioned in the Department of Revenue’s reply [27] nor in a 1999 report on their progress in implementing 1998 audit [28]. Religion continues to go undefined, but religious tax exemption continues to be granted.

At what cost does Oregon grant tax exempt status to religious organizations? The state deficit for fiscal year 2004 was between $950,000.00 and $1,267,000.00 [29]. If religious organizations were taxed only for their property and only at half the rate of any other organization, the state budget would be all-but balanced within a single year.
Being religious, the defining trait that has no definition, is in the main an excuse to do as one pleases without consequence in Oregon. The majority of religious organizations in Oregon do not abuse and sacrifice children. Instead, they do nothing. Doing nothing and ruining children’s lives should not be rewarded with tax exemption.

Notes:
[1] Gunn , T. Jeremy: The Complexity of Religion and the Definition of “Religion” in International Law. Harvard Human Rights Journal Volume 16 Spring 2003. http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss16/gunn.shtml
[2] Civil Rights Act of 1964. Document Number: PL 88-352. http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/laws/majorlaw/civilr19.htm
[3] Thomas vs. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division. 450 U.S. 707. http://laws.findlaw.com/us/450/707.html
[4] ORS Chapter 128 http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/128.html
[5] ORS Chapter 307 http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/307.html
[6] Property Tax Exemptions for Special Organizations. http://www.dor.state.or.us/InfoC/310-664.html
[7] Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon vs. Smith http://laws.findlaw.com/us/494/872.html
[8] Children’s Health Care. http://www.childrenshealthcare.org/
[9] Swan, Rita. Letting Children Die for the Faith. Free Inquiry, Volume 19, Number 1. http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/swan_19_1.htm
[10] Larabee, Mark. Shield-law bills face easy win in House. Oregonian, March 5, 1999 http://www.rickross.com/reference/foc/foc9.html
[11] Children’s Health Care. http://www.childrenshealthcare.org/
[12] BBC News. Excerpts: Vatican document. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3157859.stm
[13] Pope ‘Obstructed’ Sex Abuse Inquiry. http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1469055,00.html
[14] Funds are Released to Florence Parish http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/111813879118220.xml&coll=7
[15] Sunday Oregonian, May 23, 2004, Page A-14.
[16] State of Oregon Department of Revenue Property Tax Exemptions. March 24, 1998. Page 51. http://www.sos.state.or.us/audits/audreports/1998_year.html
[17] Sunday Oregonian, May 23, 2004, Page A-14.
[18] Americans United Reports Eight Churches to IRS for Distributing Christian Coalition Voter Guides During November Elections. December 10 1998. http://www.au.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6112&abbr=pr&JServSessionIdr012=i6cieg36h2.app1b&news_iv_ctrl=1502
[19] Christian Coalition of Oregon http://www.coalition.org/
[20] Dobson speaks to NW pastors about same-sex debate. KATU April 5 2004. http://www.katu.com/news/story.asp?ID=66042
[21] Bush Campaign [...] To Forge Church-Based Political Machine. Americans United, June 2 2004. http://www.au.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=6692&abbr=pr&security=1002&news_iv_ctrl=1241
[22] House steps into church-politics debate. USA Today. June 8 2004. http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/2004-06-08-church-politics_x.htm
[23] State of Oregon Department of Revenue Property Tax Exemptions. March 24, 1998. Page 51. http://www.sos.state.or.us/audits/audreports/1998_year.html
[24] ibid. March 24, 1998. Page 56. http://www.sos.state.or.us/audits/audreports/1998_year.html
[25] ibid. March 24, 1998. Page iii. http://www.sos.state.or.us/audits/audreports/1998_year.html
[26] ibid. March 24, 1998. Page 44. http://www.sos.state.or.us/audits/audreports/1998_year.html
[27] ibid. March 24, 1998. Page 55. http://www.sos.state.or.us/audits/audreports/1998_year.html
[28] State of Oregon Department of Revenue Status of 1998 Audit Recommendations as Reported by State Agencies. November 17, 1999. http://www.sos.state.or.us/audits/audreports/1999_year.html
[29] State Budget Shortfall Map http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/budgetmap.html

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: The Watchtower Society and the End of Your World

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, watchtower, zine

The Watchtower Society, also known as the Jehovah’s Witnesses, have predicted the end of the world no less than five times. According to their founder Charles Taze Russell, their second President J.E. Rutherford, and their official magazines The Watchtower and Awake!, the world was to end in 1914. But 1914 came and went without the world ending. So the date changed to 1915. But 1915 came and went without the world ending. So the date changed to 1918. But 1918 came and went without the world ending. So the date changed to 1925. But 1925 came and went without the world ending. So the date changed to 1975. But 1975 came and went without the world ending. So they stopped making public predictions about the end of the world and purged members (nearly 30,000 in 1978 alone) who questioned these false prophecies. Making failed predictions is a sure way to look stupid, but looking stupid isn’t so bad. Where the Watchtower Society really stands out is denying medical care for their children, based on fickle revelations from God to their leadership. Sometimes they ban medical procedures such as blood transfusions or organ transplants, sometimes they do not ban them – too bad if your child died while the ban was in effect. Maybe it wasn’t the end of the world, just the end of your child, that the Jehovah’s Witnesses were able to bring about.

THE WORLD WILL END IN 1914
“And, with the end of A.D. 1914, what God calls Babylon , and what men call Christendom, will have passed away, as is already shown from prophecy.” Charles Taze Russell, Studies In The Scriptures, Vol. III
“…we consider it an established truth that the final end of the kingdoms of this world, and the full establishment of the Kingdom of God, will be accomplished by the end of A.D. 1914″ Charles Taze Russell, The Finished Mystery.

NO, WAIT, THE WORLD WILL END IN 1915
“In the coming 26 years [1889+25], all present governments will be overthrown and dissolved.” Charles Taze Russell, Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. II
“The Gentile Times prove that the present governments must all be overthrown about the close of A.D. 1915.” Charles Taze Russell, The Time Is At Hand.

NO, WAIT, THE WORLD WILL END IN 1918
“… in the year 1918, when God destroys the churches wholesale and the church members by millions, it shall be that any that escape shall come to the works of Pastor Russell to learn the meaning of the downfall of Christianity.” The Finished Mystery (1917 edition).

NO, WAIT, THE WORLD WILL END IN 1925
“… there will be a resurrection of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and other faithful ones of old … we may expect 1925 to witness the return of these faithful men of Israel from the condition of death, being resurrected and fully restored to perfect humanity and made the visible, legal representatives of the new order of things on earth… Therefore we may confidently expect that 1925 will mark the return of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the faithful prophets of old, particularly those named by the Apostle in Hebrews 11, to the condition of human perfection.” J.E. Rutherford, Millions Now Living Will Never Die.
“Fulfilled prophecy shows beyond a doubt that (Christ) did appear in 1874. Fulfilled prophecy is otherwise designated the physical facts; and these facts are indisputable… We understand that the jubilee type began to count in 1575 B.C.; and the 3,500 year period embracing the type must end in 1925… It follows, then, that the year 1925 will mark the beginning of the restoration of all things lost by Adam’s disobedience.” J.E. Rutherford, The Watchtower, November 1 1922
“Our thought is, that 1925 is definitely settled by the scriptures. As to Noah, the Christian now has much more upon which to base his faith than Noah had upon which to base his faith in a coming deluge.” The Watchtower, April 1 1923

NO, WAIT, THE WORLD WILL END IN 1975
“[...] according to reliable Bible chronology Adam was created in the year 4026 BCE, likely in the autumn of the year, at the end of the sixth day of creation.” [...]  “According to reliable Bible chronology, Adam and Eve were created in 4026 BCE.” [...] “Are we to assume from this study that the battle of Armageddon will be all over by the autumn of 1975, and the long-looked-for thousand-year reign of Christ will begin by then? Possibly, but we wait to see how closely the seventh thousand-year period of man’s existence coincides with the sabbathlike thousand-year reign of Christ… Our chronology, however, which is reasonably accurate (but admittedly not infallible), at the best only points to the autumn of 1975 as the end of 6,000 years of man’s existence on earth.” The Watchtower April 1, 1968; Awake! October 8, 1968; The Watchtower August 15, 1968.

BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS FORBIDDEN!
Watchtower September 15 1961 pp. 563-564
Watchtower February 15 1964 pp. 127-8

BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS NOT FORBIDDEN!
Watchtower November 15 1964 pp. 680-3
Watchtower June 15 2000 p. 31

ORGAN TRANSPLANT FORBIDDEN!
Watchtower November 15 1967 pp. 702-4
Awake! June 8 1968 p. 21

ORGAN TRANSPLANT NOT FORBIDDEN!
Watchtower March 15 1980 p. 31

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: The Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints in Black and White

20 August 2010 » In christianity, hindu, mormon, ovo, periodical, race, theocracy, trevorblake, zine

Those Mormons sure are friendly. But are they friendly to all of God’s children? The following quotations from Nephi, Jacob, and Alma are from the Book of Mormon. In modern editions of the Book of Mormon the word ‘white’ (skin) is often changed to ‘pure’ (character); the original text is quoted here. As the Book of Mormon is said to be inspired by God, dictated by angels and faithfully transcribed by Joseph Smith, any modern changes are less accurate than these original quotes. Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, Bruce McConkie, Mark Peterson and Orson Pratt were or are all leaders of the LDS. African-American men were not allowed to be clergy in the LDS until 1978, nor were African-American men allowed to lead LDS Boy Scout troops. Like the Mormon revelation that polygamy was not to be practiced on Earth (only in Heaven), the revelations to white-wash the Book of Mormon and allow African-American leadership came at exactly the same time as human discontent (and lawsuits) arose against them. What a miracle!

  • And the angel said unto me: Behold these [Native Americans] shall dwindle in unbelief. And it came to pass that I beheld, after they had dwindled in unbelief they became a dark, and loathsome, and a filthy people, full of idleness and all manner of abominations. – 1 Nephi 22:23
  • And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. – 1 Nephi 13:15
  • And I beheld the Spirit of the Lord, that it was upon the Gentiles, and they did prosper and obtain the land for their inheritance; and I beheld that they were white, and exceedingly fair and beautiful, like unto my people before they were slain. And thus saith the Lord God: I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities. And cursed shall be the seed of him that mixeth with their seed; for they shall be cursed even with the same cursing. And the Lord spake it, and it was done. And because of their cursing which was upon them they did become an idle people, full of mischief and subtlety, and did seek in the wilderness for beasts of prey. – 2 Nephi 5:21:24
  • And then shall they [Native Americans] rejoice; for they shall know that it is a blessing unto them from the hand of God; and their scales of darkness shall begin to fall from their eyes; and many generations shall not pass away among them, save they shall be a white and delightsome people. – 2 Nephi 30:6
  • Behold, the Lamanites [Native Americans] your brethren, whom ye hate because of their filthiness and the cursing which hath come upon their skins, are more righteous than you; for they have not forgotten the commandment of the Lord, which was given unto our father – that they should have save it were one wife, and concubines they should have none, and there should not be whoredoms committed among them. [...] O my brethren, I fear that unless ye shall repent of your sins that their skins will be whiter than yours, when ye shall be brought with them before the throne of God. [...] Wherefore, a commandment I give unto you, which is the word of God, that ye revile no more against them because of the darkness of their skins; neither shall ye revile against them because of their filthiness; but ye shall remember your own filthiness, and remember that their filthiness came because of their fathers. – Jacob 3:5,8-9
  • And the skins of the Lamanites were dark, according to the mark which was set upon their fathers, which was a curse upon them because of their transgression and their rebellion against their brethren, who consisted of Nephi, Jacob, and Joseph, and Sam, who were just and holy men. [...] And this was done that their seed might be distinguished from the seed of their brethren, that thereby the Lord God might preserve his people, that they might not mix and believe in incorrect traditions which would prove their destruction. [...] And it came to pass that whosoever did mingle his seed with that of the Lamanites did bring the same curse upon his seed. – Alma 3:6,9
  • “Had I anything to do with the negro, I would confine them by strict law to their own species and put them on a national equalization.” – Joseph Smith
  • “Shall I tell you the law of God in regard to the African race? If the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so.” – Brigham Young
  • “…after the flood we are told that the curse that had been pronounced upon Cain was continued through Ham’s wife, as he had married a wife of that seed. And why did it pass through the flood? Because it was necessary that the devil should have a representation a upon a the earth as well as God… ” – John Taylor
  • “The negroes are not equal with other races when the receipt of certain spiritual blessings are concerned [...] As a result of his rebellion, Cain was cursed with a dark skin; he became the father of the negroes [...] Cain, Ham, and the whole negro race have [been] cursed with a black skin, the mark of Cain, so they can be identified as a caste apart, a people with whom the other descendants of Adam should not intermarry.” – Bruce McConkie
  • “At least in the cases of the Lamanites and the negroes we have the definite word of the Lord Himself that He placed a dark skin upon them as a curse – as a punishment and as a sign to all others. [...] If there is one drop of negro blood in my children, as I have read to you, they receive the curse. There isn’t any argument, therefore, as to intermarriage with the Negro, is there? Now we are generous with the Negro. We are willing that the Negro have the highest kind of education. I would be willing to let every Negro drive a Cadillac if they could afford it.” – Mark Peterson
  • “The Lord has not kept them in store for five or six thousand years past, and kept them waiting for their bodies all this time to send them among the Hottentots, the African Negroes, the idolatrous Hindoos, or any other of the fallen nations of the earth.” – Orson Pratt

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Martin Luther: Excerpts from The Jews and Their Lies

20 August 2010 » In books, christianity, fascism, judaism, ovo, periodical, race, slavery, theocracy, trevorblake, zine

Protestant Christianity was founded by Martin Luther. What did Luther have to say about Jews? Maybe Luther wasn’t such a great moral leader after all. Maybe these proposals bore fruit in Luther’s country four hundred years later.  The following are quotes from Luther’s book The Jews and Their Lies (1543).

I had made up my mind to write no more either about the Jews or against them. But since I learned that these miserable and accursed people do not cease to lure to themselves even us, that is, the Christians, I have published this little book, so that I might be found among those who opposed such poisonous activities of the Jews who warned the Christians to be on their guard against them. I would not have believed that a Christian could be duped by the Jews into taking their exile and wretchedness upon himself. However, the devil is the god of the world, and wherever God’s word is absent he has an easy task, not only with the weak but also with the strong. May God help us. Amen

My essay, I hope, will furnish a Christian (who in any case has no desire to become a Jew) with enough material not only to defend himself against the blind, venomous Jews, but also to become the foe of the Jews’ malice, lying, and cursing, and to understand not only that their belief is false but that they are surely possessed by all devils. May Christ, our dear Lord, convert them mercifully and preserve us steadfastly and immovably in the knowledge of him, which is eternal life. Amen.

What shall we Christians do with this rejected and condemned people, the Jews? Since they live among us, we dare not tolerate their conduct, now that we are aware of their lying and reviling and blaspheming. If we do, we become sharers in their lies, cursing and blasphemy. Thus we cannot extinguish the unquenchable fire of divine wrath, of which the prophets speak, nor can we convert the Jews. With prayer and the fear of God we must practice a sharp mercy to see whether we might save at least a few from the glowing flames. We dare not avenge ourselves. Vengeance a thousand times worse than we could wish them already has them by the throat. I shall give you my sincere advice:

First to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a stone or cinder of them. This is to be done in honor of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians, and do not condone or knowingly tolerate such public lying, cursing, and blaspheming of his Son and of his Christians. For whatever we tolerated in the past unknowingly – and I myself was unaware of it – will be pardoned by God. But if we, now that we are informed, were to protect and shield such a house for the Jews, existing right before our very nose, in which they lie about, blaspheme, curse, vilify, and defame Christ and us (as was heard above), it would be the same as if we were doing all this and even worse ourselves, as we very well know.

Second, I advise that their houses also be razed and destroyed. For they pursue in them the same aims as in their synagogues. Instead they might be lodged under a roof or in a barn, like the gypsies. This will bring home to them that they are not masters in our country, as they boast, but that they are living in exile and in captivity, as they incessantly wail and lament about us before God.
Third, I advise that all their prayer books and Talmudic writings, in which such idolatry, lies, cursing and blasphemy are taught, be taken from them.

Fourth, I advise that their rabbis be forbidden to teach henceforth on pain of loss of life and limb. For they have justly forfeited the right to such an office by holding the poor Jews captive with the saying of Moses (Deuteronomy 17 [:10]) in which he commands them to obey their teachers on penalty of death, although Moses clearly adds: “what they teach you in accord with the law of the Lord.” Those villains ignore that. They wantonly employ the poor people’s obedience contrary to the law of the Lord and infuse them with this poison, cursing, and blasphemy. In the same way the pope also held us captive with the declaration in Matthew 16 [:18], “You are Peter,” etc, inducing us to believe all the lies and deceptions that issued from his devilish mind. He did not teach in accord with the word of God, and therefore he forfeited the right to teach.

Fifth, I advise that safe conduct on the highways be abolished completely for the Jews. For they have no business in the countryside, since they are not lords, officials, tradesmen, or the like. Let they stay at home.

Sixth, I advise that usury be prohibited to them, and that all cash and treasure of silver and gold be taken from them and put aside for safekeeping. The reason for such a measure is that, as said above, they have no other means of earning a livelihood than usury, and by it they have stolen and robbed from us all they possess. Such money should now be used in no other way than the following: Whenever a Jew is sincerely converted, he should be handed one hundred, two hundred, or three hundred florins, as personal circumstances may suggest. With this he could set himself up in some occupation for the support of his poor wife and children, and the maintenance of the old or feeble. For such evil gains are cursed if they are not put to use with God’s blessing in a good and worthy cause.

Seventh, I commend putting a flail, an axe, a hoe, a spade, a distaff, or a spindle into the hands of young, strong Jews and Jewesses and letting them earn their bread in the sweat of their brow, as was imposed on the children of Adam (Gen 3[:19]). For it is not fitting that they should let us accursed Goyim toil in the sweat of our faces while they, the holy people, idle away their time behind the stove, feasting and farting, and on top of all, boasting blasphemously of their lordship over the Christians by means of our sweat. No, one should toss out these lazy rogues by the seat of their pants.

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Thirty Failed Prophecies in the Bible

20 August 2010 » In christianity, magick, ovo, periodical, theocracy, zine

magine that you meet someone who offered you a magic pony, a bag of candy, and to be your best friend forever. The generous stranger promised thirty times they would do these things for you within your lifetime, and then disappeared. They never came back in your life, or the lives of your children, or your children’s children, or any of your descendants for over two thousand years. Would it make sense to keep waiting for the generous stranger who made such amazing promises, or would you admit that he told a nice story but didn’t deliver the goods? Jesus said thirty times that He would establish the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth within the lifetime of those who saw Him speak. Two thousand years later, Christians are still making excuses for their lying Messiah.

  • The great day of the LORD is near, it is near, and hasteth greatly, even the voice of the day of the LORD: the mighty man shall cry there bitterly. – Zephaniah 1:14
  • For thus saith the LORD of hosts; Yet once, it is a little while, and I will shake the heavens, and the earth, and the sea, and the dry land; And I will shake all nations, and the desire of all nations shall come: and I will fill this house with glory, saith the LORD of hosts. – Haggai 2:6-8
  • But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I [Jesus] say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come. – Matthew 10:23
  • Verily I [Jesus] say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. – Matthew 16:28
  • Verily I [Jesus] say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. – Matthew 23:36
  • And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. – Matthew 24:14 [Romans 10:18 states: But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.]
  • Verily I [Jesus] say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. – Matthew 24:34
  • Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. – Matthew 26:64
  • And he [Jesus] said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power. – Mark 9:1
  • Verily I [Jesus] say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done. – Mark 13:30
  • And Jesus said, I am: and ye [“the high priest”] shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. – Mark 14:62
  • But I [Jesus] tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God. – Luke 9:27
  • Verily, verily, I [Jesus] say unto you, the hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. – John 5:25
  • And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armor of light. – Romans 13:11-12
  • But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none. -  1 Corinthians 7:29
  • Now all these things happened unto them for examples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. – 1 Corinthians 10:11
  • Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord is at hand. – Philippians 4:5
  • For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. [...] Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. -  1 Thessalonians 4:15, 17
  • That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. -  2 Thessalonians 2:2
  • God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds. – Hebrews 1:1,2
  • For then must he [Jesus] often have suffered since the foundation of the world: but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. – Hebrews 9:26
  • For yet a little while, and he [Jesus] that shall come will come, and will not tarry. – Hebrews 10:37
  • Be ye also patient; establish your hearts: for the coming of the Lord draweth nigh. – James 5:8
  • Who [Jesus] verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you. – 1 Peter 1:20
  • But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer. – 1 Peter 4:7
  • Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that Antichrist shall come, even now are there many Antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. – 1 John 2:18
  • Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. – 1 John 3:2
  • The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John [...] Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand. – Revelation 1:1, 3
  • Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown [...] Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book. – Revelation 3:11, 22:7, 12
  • And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. – Revelation 22:12

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: The Twelve Apostles

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, sex, trevorblake, zine

The Bible sure likes the number twelve: twelve sons of Jacob, twelve tribes of Israel, twelve golden dishes for the dedication of the alter, twelve baskets of bread, twelve Apostles, twelve stars on the woman’s head, twelve gates and foundations of new Jerusalem, the tree of life bears twelve manner of fruit, and the twelve apostles of the Lamb. What an amazing coincidence that the ancients also held that there were twelve signs of the zodiac. The Bible states clearly that there were more than twelve apostles, but echoes of the twelve houses of astrology are what people remember when counting the apostles. The Bible supports astrology: God made the stars “for signs” (Genesis 1:14), a star was the sign of Jesus’ birth (Matthew 2:1-2), and Jesus condones the use of stars for divination (Luke 21:25).

Who Were the Twelve Apostles?

  • Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the publican; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus; Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed Him. – Matthew 10:2-4
  • And He [Jesus] ordained twelve, that they should be with Him, and that He might send them forth to preach, and to have power to heal sicknesses, and to cast out devils: and Simon He surnamed Peter; and James the son of Zebedee, and John the brother of James; and He surnamed them Boanerges, which is, the sons of thunder: and Andrew, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus, and Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, which also betrayed Him: and they went into an house. – Mark 3:14-19

No, Really, Who Were the Twelve Apostles?

  • And when it was day, he called unto Him His disciples: and of them He chose twelve, whom also He named apostles; Simon, (whom he also named Peter,) and Andrew his brother, James and John, Philip and Bartholomew, Matthew and Thomas, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon called Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James, and Judas Iscariot, which also was the traitor. – Luke 6:13-16

Wait, Say That Again, Who Were the Twelve Apostles?

  • And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James. – Act 1:13

Were there maybe Thirteen Apostles?

  • Am I [Paul] not an apostle? – 1 Corinthians 9:1

How About Fourteen Apostles?

  • Other of the apostles I saw none, save James the Lord’s brother. – Galatians 1:19

Do I Hear Fifteen?

  • He was buried and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures: and that He was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve. – 1 Corinthians 15:4-5

Could There Be Seventeen Apostles, Including a Woman?

  • Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellow-prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me. – Romans 16:7

Should We Count Judas’ Replacement? Make it Eighteen, Then.

  • And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles. – Acts 1:26

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Biblical Anti-Semitism

20 August 2010 » In christianity, judaism, ovo, periodical, zine

Christianity often presents itself as “Jew 2.0” – a yummy chosen people treat with a Messiah in every bite. But what does the Bible have to say about its parent superstition, Judaism? Kind of makes those ‘Hitler was an atheist’ arguments fall flat.

  • [Jesus said:] But the children of the kingdom [the Jews] shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. – Matthew 8:12
  • [Jesus said:] Wherefore ye [the Jews] be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. – Mathew 23:31
  • Then answered all the people, and said, His [Jesus'] blood be on us [the Jews], and on our children. – Mathew 27:25
  • And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day. [...]
  • Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God. – John 5:16,18

  • After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him. – John 7:1
  • Howbeit no man spake openly of him for fear of the Jews. – John 7:13
  • [Jesus said: ]Ye [the Jews] are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. – John 8:44
  • His [Jesus'] disciples say unto him, Master, the Jews of late sought to stone thee; and goest thou thither again? – John 11:8
  • The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he [Jesus] ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God. [...] And from thenceforth Pilate sought to release him: but the Jews cried out, saying, If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar’s friend: whosoever maketh himself a king speaketh against Caesar. [...] And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar.- John 19:7, 12, 14-15
  • Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. – John 20:19
  • But ye [the Jews] denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you; And killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses. – Acts 3:14-15
  • The God of our fathers [the Jews] raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree. – Acts 5:30
  • Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye [the Jews]. Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers. – Acts 7:51-52
  • But Saul increased the more in strength, and confounded the Jews which dwelt at Damascus, proving that this is very Christ.
  • And after that many days were fulfilled, the Jews took counsel to kill him. – Acts 9:22-23

  • And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree. – Acts 10:39
  • Now about that time Herod the king stretched forth his hands to vex certain of the church. And he killed James the brother of John with the sword. And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. – Acts 12:1-3
  • But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming. Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles. [...] But the Jews stirred up the devout and honourable women, and the chief men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled them out of their coasts. – Acts 13: 45-46, 50
  • But the unbelieving Jews stirred up the Gentiles, and made their minds evil affected against the brethren. – Acts 14:2
  • But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people. [...] But when the Jews of Thessalonica had knowledge that the word of God was preached of Paul at Berea, they came thither also, and stirred up the people. – Acts 17:5, 13

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: The Secret Gospel of Mark

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, zine

Ask your preacher about the Secret Gospel of Mark this Sunday, won’t you?

Mark 10:46 states: “Then they came to Jericho. As He was leaving Jericho with His disciples…” This verse is puzzling: why mention that Jesus and His disciples went to Jericho and then left Jericho? Did something happen in Jericho that isn’t mentioned in the modern Bible? A discovery made in 1958 may provide the answer.

In 1958, Morton Smith (a theology graduate student from Columbia University) went to the Mar Saba Monastery near Jerusalem to catalog their library. While he was there, Smith discovered a transcription of a letter written by Clement of Alexandria to “Theodore” laid into the back of the 1646 edition of a book called Epistolae genuinae S. Ignatii Martyris. The letter claims that in earlier editions of Mark there was a passage that described what Jesus and His disciples did in Jericho. Here is the missing passage:

[Then they came to Jericho.] And they came into Bethany. And a certain woman whose brother had died was there. And, coming, she prostrated herself before Jesus and said to Him, ‘Son of David, have mercy on me.’ But the disciples rebuked her. And Jesus, being angered, went off with her into the garden where the tomb was, and straightway a great cry was heard from the tomb. And going near, Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb. And straightaway, going in where the youth was, He stretched forth His hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth, looking upon Him, loved Him and began to beseech Him that he might be with Him. And going out of the tomb, they came into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days Jesus told him what to do, and in the evening the youth came to Him, wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with Him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the Kingdom of God. And thence, arising, he returned to the other side of the Jordan. [As He was leaving Jericho with His disciples...]

The Secret Gospel of Mark is missing from all modern versions of the Bible although it is as credible as any other work to be found there. But other accounts of God-sanctioned nudity remain. A naked young man was with Jesus and the disciples when Jesus was arrested (Mark 14:51-52). Saul prophecies naked (1 Samuel 19:24), as does Isaiah (Isaiah 20:25) and Micah (Micah 1:8).

Early Christianity clearly included a nude ritual of initiation; this is what Jesus means when He says we must be ‘born again’ (we are born naked). The world might be a different place indeed if Christians still considered observing the naked body sacred rather than a sin.

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: God Demands Human Sacrifice

20 August 2010 » In christianity, food, ovo, periodical, theocracy, trevorblake, zine

No way, no way, nowhere in the Bible does it say that God demands human sacrifice. That’s utterly false. You’re just making stuff up because you’re mad at God for not existing. What a lie! Nobody can take you seriously when you publish nonsense like that. Have you ever even read the Bible? Prove it, show me where it says God demands human sacrifice – you can’t! Go on! Show me, show me where it says that!

  • And He [God] said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of. – Genesis 22:2
  • Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits, and of thy liquors: the firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto Me [God]. Likewise shalt thou do with thine oxen, and with thy sheep: seven days it shall be with his dam; on the eighth day thou shalt give it Me. – Exodus 22:29-30
  • No devoted thing, that a man shall devote unto the LORD of all that he hath, both of man and beast… shall be sold or redeemed: every devoted thing is most holy unto the LORD. None devoted, which shall be devoted of men, shall be redeemed; but shall surely be put to death. – Leviticus 27:28-29
  • And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Take the sum of the prey that was taken, both of man and of beast, thou, and Eleazar the priest, and the chief fathers of the congregation: And divide the prey into two parts; between them that took the war upon them, who went out to battle, and between all the congregation: And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men of war which went out to battle: one soul of five hundred, both of the persons, and of the beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep: Take it of their half, and give it unto Eleazar the priest, for an heave offering of the LORD. – Numbers 31:25-29
  • And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the LORD thy God hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee: So that the man that is tender among you, and very delicate, his eye shall be evil toward his brother, and toward the wife of his bosom, and toward the remnant of his children which he shall leave: So that he will not give to any of them of the flesh of his children whom he shall eat: because he hath nothing left him in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee in all thy gates. The tender and delicate woman among you, which would not adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness and tenderness, her eye shall be evil toward the husband of her bosom, and toward her son, and toward her daughter, and toward her young one that cometh out from between her feet, and toward her children which she shall bear: for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and straitness, wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates. If thou wilt not observe to do all the words of this law that are written in this book, that thou mayest fear this glorious and fearful name, THE LORD THY GOD; then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance. Moreover He will bring upon thee all the diseases of Egypt, which thou wast afraid of; and they shall cleave unto thee. Also every sickness, and every plague, which is not written in the book of this law, them will the LORD bring upon thee, until thou be destroyed. And ye shall be left few in number, whereas ye were as the stars of heaven for multitude; because thou wouldest not obey the voice of the LORD thy God. – Deuteronomy 28:53-62
  • Then the Spirit of the LORD came upon Jephthah… And Jephthah vowed a vow unto the LORD, and said, If thou shalt without fail deliver the children of Ammon into mine hands, Then it shall be, that whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall surely be the LORD’s, and I will offer it up for a burnt offering. So Jephthah passed over unto the children of Ammon to fight against them; and the LORD delivered them into his hands… And Jephthah came to Mizpeh unto his house, and, behold, his daughter came out to meet him with timbrels and with dances: and she was his only child… And it came to pass, when he saw her, that he rent his clothes, and said, alas, my daughter! thou hast brought me very low, and thou art one of them that trouble me: for I have opened my mouth unto the LORD, and I cannot go back. And she said unto him, My father, if thou hast opened thy mouth unto the LORD, do to me according to that which hath proceeded out of thy mouth… And it came to pass at the end of two months, that she returned unto her father, who did with her according to his vow which he had vowed. – Judges 11:29-40
  • Then there was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year; and David enquired of the LORD. And the LORD answered, It is for Saul, and for his bloody house, because he slew the Gibeonites… The king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul… And he delivered them into the hands of the Gibeonites, and they hanged them in the hill before the LORD… And after that God was intreated for the land. – 2 Samuel 21:1,8-9,14
  • And he cried against the altar in the word of the LORD, and said, O altar, altar, thus saith the LORD; Behold, a child shall be born unto the house of David, Josiah by name; and upon thee shall he offer the priests of the high places that burn incense upon thee, and men’s bones shall be burnt upon thee. – 1 Kings 13:2
  • And he slew all the priests of the high places that were there upon the altars, and burned men’s bones upon them. – 2 Kings 23:20
  • Wherefore I [God] gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments whereby they should not live; And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the LORD. – Ezekiel 20:25-26

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: The Ten Commandments(s)

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, theocracy, trevorblake, zine

Christians consider “The Ten Commandments” a moral guide, one that should be displayed at tax-payer expense in public places. But do the thing no Christian ever does – read the Bible – and you will see that following the Ten Commandments is not only immoral but impossible. Not even Jesus could do it!

Many people, Christian or not, know the story of the Ten Commandments. God gives Moses the Ten Commandments on tables of stone, Moses brings the tables to his people but is shocked to find them worshiping a golden calf, Moses destroys the tables but God gives Moses another copy. Many people are familiar with this story, but that is not the story to be found in the Bible. The main difference between what many people know and what the Bible says is that the first table of the Ten Commandments is not at all the same as the second table of the Ten Commandments.

The difference between the two is problematic because the Bible does not say they are different, but the same. Exodus 20 lists the contents of the first table (called here the ‘first Ten Commandments’). Exodus 34 lists the contents of the second table (called here the ‘second Ten Commandments’). Compare these two ‘Ten Commandments’ – are they the same? According to the Bible, they should be. Exodus 34:1 claims the second ‘Ten Commandments’ contains “the words that were on the first.” The first and second ‘Ten Commandments’ are quoted here at length. Commandments are indicated with numbers in brackets (for example, [#1]).

The First ‘Ten Commandments’

And God spake all these words, saying, [#1] I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. [#2] Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. [#3] Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. [#4] Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. [#5] Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. [#6] Thou shalt not kill. [#7] Thou shalt not commit adultery. [#8] Thou shalt not steal. [#9] Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour. [#10] Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s. – Exodus 20:1-17

The Second ‘Ten Commandments’

[#1] For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God: Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice; And thou take of their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods. [#2] Thou shalt make thee no molten gods. [#3] The feast of unleavened bread shalt thou keep. Seven days thou shalt eat unleavened bread, as I commanded thee, in the time of the month Abib: for in the month Abib thou camest out from Egypt. [#4] All that openeth the matrix is mine; and every firstling among thy cattle, whether ox or sheep, that is male. But the firstling of an ass thou shalt redeem with a lamb: and if thou redeem him not, then shalt thou break his neck. All the firstborn of thy sons thou shalt redeem. And none shall appear before me empty. [#5] Six days thou shalt work, but on the seventh day thou shalt rest: in earing time and in harvest thou shalt rest. [#6] And thou shalt observe the feast of weeks, of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the feast of ingathering at the year’s end. Thrice in the year shall all your menchildren appear before the LORD God, the God of Israel. For I will cast out the nations before thee, and enlarge thy borders: neither shall any man desire thy land, when thou shalt go up to appear before the LORD thy God thrice in the year. [#7] Thou shalt not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leaven; [#8] neither shall the sacrifice of the feast of the passover be left unto the morning. [#9] The first of the firstfruits of thy land thou shalt bring unto the house of the LORD thy God. [#10] Thou shalt not seethe a kid in his mother’s milk. And the LORD said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel. – Exodus 34:14-27

What is a Christian to do? Should they petition for schools and courthouses to post the divine admonishment against seething a kid in his mother’s milk? Should they claim that the United States was founded on the principle of not leaving the sacrifice of the feast of the passover until the next morning? The Bible claims the (second) ‘Ten Commandments’ are the tables that served as God’s final word, the tables that Moses actually gave to the Israelites. Christians seem to know better than God, and they prefer the first ‘Ten Commandments’ to the second. Christians never talk about the real (second) ‘Ten Commandments.’

Christians also never talk about what the penalties are for violating the (first) ‘Ten Commandments.’ But the Bible is not silent on the issue. The penalty for violating much of the (first) ‘Ten Commandments’ is death. Not eventual death, which we all get, but death at the hands of Christians. The ‘Ten Commandments’ are immoral.

[#1 & #2] He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed. – Exodus 22:20. If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is of thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. Thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the Lord thy God. – Deuteronomy 14:6-10. And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heavens, which I have not commanded. Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing and shalt stone them with stones, till they die. – Deuteronomy 17:1-5.
[#3] And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death. -  Leviticus 24:16
[#4] Six days may work be done; but in the seventh is the sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD: whosoever doeth any work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death. Exodus 31:15. And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man that gathered sticks upon the Sabbath day…And all the congregation brought him without the camp, and stoned him with stones, and he died; as the Lord commanded Moses. -Numbers 15:32.
[#5] And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death. Exodus 21:15. For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death. Leviticus 20:9.
[#6] He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death. – Exodus 21:12
[#7] And the man that committeth adultery with another man’s wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour’s wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. – Leviticus 20:10
[#8] If a man be found stealing any of his brethren of the children of Israel, and maketh merchandise of him, or selleth him; then that thief shall die. – Deuteronomy 24:7.

What did Jesus Christ say about the ‘Ten Commandments?’ In Matthew 19:17, Jesus says: “But if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.” Upon hearing this, someone asked Jesus which of the commandments were to be kept. Jesus replied: “[#6] Thou shalt do no murder, [#7] Thou shalt not commit adultery, [#8] Thou shalt not steal, [#9] Thou shalt not bear false witness, [#5] Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.” Note that the commandment to love one’s neighbor as oneself does not appear in either of the two ‘Ten Commandments.’ The account given in Mark 10 is largely the same: Jesus gives five out of the ten ‘Ten Commandments’ and adds one new commandment. Jesus is said to have created this new commandment in John 13:34. But creating a new commandment is in direct violation of the commandments to not add to or take from God’s commandments (Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:34; Revelations 22:19). And so Jesus both tells others to keep the commandments and does not keep them Himself. Jesus sins against God.

This is not the only time Jesus sins against God. Luke 6:1-4 describes Jesus and His disciples stealing corn on the Sabbath, thus violating two commandments at once. John 7:8-10 describes Jesus telling a lie, saying He is not going to a feast and then going anyway. Jesus accuses God of forsaking Him (Jesus) in Matthew 27:46 – is this blasphemy from lips of the Son of God? Jesus dishonors His Own Mother by saying “Woman, what have I to do with thee?” (John 2:4).

Perhaps Jesus was only following the example of His Father in violating the ‘Ten Commandments.’ God orders Moses to kill the faithful of another religion in Numbers 25:4,5 and Moses does just that. God also covets the cities of the Midianites and the Canaanites, so He orders Moses to kill all the men and take their land (Exodus 31:1-54, 33:50-52), and again Moses does as he is told. God leads Moses to the murder of women and children in Deuteronomy 2:34. God doesn’t mind when Moses commits adultery in Exodus 2:21-22. All this occurs after God gives Moses the ‘Ten Commandments.’

There are many other commandments found in the Bible, indicated as divine by the phrase “so sayeth the LORD.” The Bible commands Christians to take slaves (Leviticus 25:44-46), not eat shellfish (Leviticus 11:10-12), sacrifice animals (Numbers 15:3, 14-15, 24), drink poison (Mark 16:17-18), sell everything they own and use the money to buy a sword (Luke 12:33, 22:36), and how many more examples does one need before it all starts to look a little foolish?

Problems with the ‘Ten Commandments’ seem unending. Were they given to Moses on Mount Sinai (Exodus 31:18, 34:4, 34:32; Leviticus 26:46, 27:34: Nehemiah 9:13) or Mount Horeb (1 Kings 8:9; 2 Chronicles 5:10; Malachi 4:4)? God commands us to not make graven images AND to make graven images (Exodus 25:18; Numbers 21:8). God commands us to keep the Sabbath AND to not keep the Sabbath (Isaiah 1:13; Matthew 12:2; John 5:16; Romans 14:5; Colossians 2:16). God commands us to not commit adultery AND to commit adultery (Numbers 31:18; Hosea 1:2, 3:1). God commands us not to steal AND to steal (Exodus 3:22, 12:35-36; Ezekiel 39:10).God commands us not to lie AND to lie (Joshuah 2:4-6; James 2:25; Exodus 1:18-20; 1 Kings 22:21-22; 2 Kings 8:10; 2 Corinthians 12:16). God commands us not to covet AND to covet (1 Corinthians 12:31, 14:39).

To follow the (first) ‘Ten Commandments’ is to violate the (second) ‘Ten Commandments.’ To follow either ‘Ten Commandments’ is to go against Jesus, who commands us to keep the commandments while also going against the commandments Himself. Neither Jesus nor God’s chosen nor God Himself follow the ‘Ten Commandments,’ but death in this world at Christian hands and eternal damnation in the next is guaranteed for those who do not follow the ‘Ten Commandments.’ It simply isn’t possible or desirable to use the ‘Ten Commandments’ as a guide for ethics or law.

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Biblical Innumeracy

20 August 2010 » In christianity, math, ovo, periodical, science, trevorblake, zine

The venus fly trap closes around its prey only when two of its triggers are touched; one trigger alone does not close the trap. In a sense, this plant can count. Some dogs and birds can be taught how to count. Children are able to count at a very early age. It seems that everyone can count except God, at least as far as the Bible is concerned. If the Bible is irredeemably incorrect in these relatively trivial matters, can the perfect Christian God really exist? And is the Bible a worthy guide for more complex issues such as morals and history when the authors clearly cannot even count the number of names in a list they just wrote? If these examples of Biblical innumeracy are as wrong as they appear to be, why aren’t they corrected?

36 ≠ 29
And the uttermost cities of the tribe of the children of Judah toward the coast of Edom southward were Kabzeel, and Eder, and Jagur, and Kinah, and Dimonah, and Adadah, and Kedesh, and Hazor, and Ithnan, Ziph, and Telem, and Bealoth, and Hazor, Hadattah, and Kerioth, and Hezron, which is Hazor, Amam, and Shema, and Moladah, and Hazargaddah, and Heshmon, and Bethpalet, and Hazarshual, and Beersheba, and Bizjothjah, Baalah, and Iim, and Azem, and Eltolad, and Chesil, and Hormah, and Ziklag, and Madmannah, and Sansannah, and Lebaoth, and Shilhim, and Ain, and Rimmon: all the cities are twenty and nine, with their villages. – Joshua 15:21-32

15 ≠ 14
And in the valley, Eshtaol, and Zoreah, and Ashnah, and Zanoah, and Engannim, Tappuah, and Enam, Jarmuth, and Adullam, Socoh, and Azekah, and Sharaim, and Adithaim, and Gederah, and Gederothaim; fourteen cities with their villages. – Joshua 15:33-36

14 ≠ 13
And they had in their inheritance Beersheba, and Sheba, and Moladah, and Hazarshual, and Balah, and Azem, and Eltolad, and Bethul, and Hormah, and Ziklag, and Bethmarcaboth, and Hazarsusah, and Bethlebaoth, and Sharuhen; thirteen cities and their villages. – Joshua 19:2-6

31.4 ≠ 30
And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about. – 1 Kings 7:23

5 ≠ 6
And the sons of Shemaiah; Hattush, and Igeal, and Bariah, and Neariah, and Shaphat, six. – 1 Chronicles 3:22

8 ≠ 5
And the sons of Pedaiah were, Zerubbabel, and Shimei: and the sons of Zerubbabel; Meshullam, and Hananiah, and Shelomith their sister: and Hashubah, and Ohel, and Berechiah, and Hasadiah, Jushabhesed, five. – 1 Chronicles 3:19-20

5 ≠ 6
Of Jeduthun: the sons of Jeduthun; Gedaliah, and Zeri, and Jeshaiah, Hashabiah, and Mattithiah, six, under the hands of their father Jeduthun, who prophesied with a harp, to give thanks and to praise the LORD. – 1 Chronicles 25:3

31.4 ≠ 30
Also he made a molten sea of ten cubits from brim to brim, round in compass, and five cubits the height thereof; and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about. – 2 Chronicles 4:2

2,499 ≠ 5,400
And this is the number of them: thirty chargers of gold, a thousand chargers of silver, nine and twenty knives, thirty basons of gold, silver basons of a second sort four hundred and ten, and other vessels a thousand. All the vessels of gold and of silver were five thousand and four hundred. All these did Sheshbazzar bring up with them of the captivity that were brought up from Babylon unto Jerusalem. – Ezra 1:9-11

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: God Hates Fags

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, sex, theocracy, trevorblake, zine

As much as the Metropolitan Community Church and other apologists want to disagree, Reverend Fred Phelps of the Westboro Baptist Church is correct when he claims God hates fags. The Bible is clear enough that with the exception of David and Johnathan (1 and 2 Samuel), all homosexuals are to be killed. Not by God, not by the death that comes to us all, but by the hands of Christians. If you are a Christian, you are personally required by the Bible to kill homosexuals. If you are a Christian homosexual, you need to understand that your religion wants you “taken out.” God said it, Jesus confirmed it, and that settles it.  When you abandon Christianity, this is the sort of cruel nonsense you leave behind.

  • Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. – Leviticus 18:22
  • If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. – Leviticus 20:13
  • The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. – Deuteronomy 22:5
  • There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. – Deuteronomy 23:17
  • And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel. – 1 Kings 14:24
  • And Asa did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, as did David his father. And he took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made. – 1 Kings 15:11-12
  • And the remnant of the sodomites, which remained in the days of his father Asa, he took out of the land. – 1 Kings 22:46
  • And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove. – 2 Kings 23:7
  • The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves. – Isaiah 3:9
  • For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. [...] who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. – Romans 1:26-32
  • Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. – 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
  • Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. – Jude 1:7
  • [Jesus said] Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or tittle shall nowise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. – Matthew 5:18,19
  • [Jesus said] It is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail. – Luke 16:17

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Women in the Bible

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, sex, slavery, trevorblake, zine

A question for the ladies in the audience… suppose you were asked if you would like to live in a country in which you could be bought, sold, traded and owned, where you would be required to be submissive to the wishes of any man, where the word “woman” was itself an insult, and where guilt in a rape case was based on whether or not the woman who was raped yelled loud enough. Would you like to live in a country like that? If not, then you should be equally horrified with the thought of being a Christian. The imaginary country described in this introduction is the world that the Bible wants women to live in everywhere. And don’t think that Jesus wasn’t aware of and in support of these rules – see what He had to say Himself.

Do Christians view women as slaves to be bought, sold, traded and owned?

  • And seest among the captives a beautiful woman, and hast a desire unto her, that thou wouldst have her to thy wife; Then thou shalt bring her home to thine house, and she shall shave her head, and pare her nails; And she shall put the raiment of her captivity from off her, and shall remain in thine house, and bewail her father and her mother a full month: and after that thou shalt go in unto her, and be her husband, and she shall be thy wife. – Deuteronomy 21:11-13
  • If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days. – Deuteronomy 22:28-29
  • So I bought her to me for fifteen pieces of silver, and for an homer of barley, and an half homer of barley. – Hosea 3:2
  • See also: Genesis 19:8, 29:24, 29 / Exodus 20:17, 21:7, 8 / Deuteronomy 5:21, 25:5 / Judges 1:12-13, 5:30, 14:1-3, 15:2, 19:22-30, 21:7, 10-12, 14, 20-21, 23 / Ruth 4:10 / 1 Samuel 25:44 / 2 Samuel 12:11, 13:1-22, 20:3 / Esther 1:7-22, 2:2-4 / Jeremiah 6:12, 8:10

Do Christians believe women must be submissive to men?

  • Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. -  1 Corinthians 14:34-35
  • Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the Saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. – Ephesians 5:22-24
  • In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety. – 1 Timothy 2:9-15
  • But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. – 1 Corinthians 11:3
  • But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoreth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, for asmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels. -  1 Corinthians 11:5-10
  • Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord. – Colossians 3:18
  • Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives; While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear. Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price. For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands: Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement. Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honor unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered. – 1 Peter 3:1-7
  • See also: Numbers 30:3-16 / Deuteronomy 22:5

Do Christians consider it an insult to be called a woman?

  • See: Isaiah 19:16 / Jeremiah 50:37 / Nahum 3:13

Do Christians say if a woman doesn’t yell enough when being raped she should be killed?

  • If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbor’s wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you. – Deuteronomy 22:23-24

Does Jesus Support the Laws of the Old Testament?

  • Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or tittle shall nowise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. – Mark 5:18-19
  • It is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail. -  Luke 16:17

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Infallible and Eternal

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, trevorblake, zine

It never fails. Point out a contradiction, an atrocity or an absurdity in the Bible to a Christian and you will be told that you shouldn’t be so literal, so legalistic; that the Bible is to be taken metaphorically; or through ‘feelings;’ or understood ‘spiritually;’ or you should remember to take the Bible ‘in context’ of the time it was written. They will even quote the Bible to prove one should not quote from the Bible. But what does the Bible itself has to say on the subject? Does the Bible claim it is the occasionally true word of a sometimes correct God that applies when we feel like it? Or does the Bible claim that it is the perfect and eternal word of an unchanging, all-knowing God who is the same as (and makes the same demands as) Jesus?

The Law of God is Eternal

  • God is not a man that he should lie; neither the son of a man that he should repent. – Numbers 23:19
  • The Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent. – 1 Samuel 15:29
  • I the LORD have spoken it: it shall come to pass, and I will do it; I will not go back, neither will I spare, neither will I repent. – Ezekial 24:14
  • For I am the Lord, I change not. – Malachi 3:6
  • With whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. – James 1:17
  • It shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations. – Leviticus 23:14,21,31
  • Thou art near, O LORD; and all thy commandments are truth. Concerning thy testimonies, I have known of old that thou hast founded them for ever. – Psalms 119:151-2
  • Thy word is true from the beginning: and every one of thy righteous judgments endureth for ever. – Psalms 119:160
  • Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or tittle shall nowise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:18-19
  • It is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail. – Luke 16:17
  • Now are we sure that thou knowest all things. – John 16:30
  • Lord, thou knowest all things. – John 21:17
  • Of Christ; In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. – Colossians 2:2-3
  • We ought to obey God rather than men. – Acts 5:29

God’s Law (Old Testament) is Jesus’ Law (New Testament)

  • In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. – John 1:1
  • And the Word was made flesh [Jesus], and dwelt among us. – John 1:14
  • Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. – John 8:58
  • I [Jesus] and my Father are one. – John 10:30
  • The Father is in me, and I [Jesus] in him. – John 10:38
  • And Thomas answered and said unto Him [Jesus], My Lord and my God. – John 20:28
  • For in Him [Jesus] dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily. – Colossians 2:9
  • Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ. – Titus 2:13
  • Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God. – Philippians 2:6
  • Fear not; I am the first and the last. – Revelation 1:17
  • I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. – Revelation 22:13

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Unicorns, Dragons, God and Other Imaginary Monsters

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, science, trevorblake, zine

Christians hold that the Bible contains factual information about the natural world. But while the Bible says nothing at all about germs (an insight that would have proven the existence of some advanced thinker, maybe even God, and would have saved billions of lives), the Bible does go on about unicorns, dragons and other imaginary monsters.

  • Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps. – Deuteronomy 32:33
  • Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him. Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play. He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens. The shady trees cover him with their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about. Behold, he drinketh up a river, and hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth. He taketh it with his eyes: his nose pierceth through snares. – Job 40:15-24
  • Canst thou draw out leviathan with an hook? or his tongue with a cord which thou lettest down? Canst thou put an hook into his nose? or bore his jaw through with a thorn? Will he make many supplications unto thee? will he speak soft words unto thee? Will he make a covenant with thee? wilt thou take him for a servant for ever? Wilt thou play with him as with a bird? or wilt thou bind him for thy maidens? Shall the companions make a banquet of him? shall they part him among the merchants? Canst thou fill his skin with barbed irons? or his head with fish spears? Lay thine hand upon him, remember the battle, do no more. Behold, the hope of him is in vain: shall not one be cast down even at the sight of him? None is so fierce that dare stir him up: who then is able to stand before me? Who hath prevented me, that I should repay him? whatsoever is under the whole heaven is mine. I will not conceal his parts, nor his power, nor his comely proportion. Who can discover the face of his garment? or who can come to him with his double bridle? Who can open the doors of his face? his teeth are terrible round about. His scales are his pride, shut up together as with a close seal. One is so near to another, that no air can come between them. They are joined one to another, they stick together, that they cannot be sundered. By his sneezings a light doth shine, and his eyes are like the eyelids of the morning. Out of his mouth go burning lamps, and sparks of fire leap out. Out of his nostrils goeth smoke, as out of a seething pot or cauldron. His breath kindleth coals, and a flame goeth out of his mouth. In his neck remaineth strength, and sorrow is turned into joy before him. The flakes of his flesh are joined together: they are firm in themselves; they cannot be moved. His heart is as firm as a stone; yea, as hard as a piece of the nether millstone. When he raiseth up himself, the mighty are afraid: by reason of breakings they purify themselves. The sword of him that layeth at him cannot hold: the spear, the dart, nor the habergeon. He esteemeth iron as straw, and brass as rotten wood. The arrow cannot make him flee: sling stones are turned with him into stubble. Darts are counted as stubble: he laugheth at the shaking of a spear. Sharp stones are under him: he spreadeth sharp pointed things upon the mire. He maketh the deep to boil like a pot: he maketh the sea like a pot of ointment. He maketh a path to shine after him; one would think the deep to be hoary. Upon earth there is not his like, who is made without fear. He beholdeth all high things: he is a king over all the children of pride. – Job 41:1-34
  • Save me from the lion’s mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns. -  Psalms 22:21
  • He maketh them also to skip like a calf; Lebanon and Sirion like a young unicorn. – Psalms 29:6
  • And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice’ den. Isaiah 11:8
  • Rejoice not thou, whole Palestina, because the rod of him that smote thee is broken: for out of the serpent’s root shall come forth a cockatrice, and his fruit shall be a fiery flying serpent. -  Isaiah 14:29
  • The burden of the beasts of the south: into the land of trouble and anguish, from whence come the young and old lion, the viper and fiery flying serpent, they will carry their riches upon the shoulders of young asses, and their treasures upon the bunches of camels, to a people that shall not profit them. – Isaiah 30:6
  • And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls; and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness. -  Isaiah 34:7
  • And thorns shall come up in her palaces, nettles and brambles in the fortresses thereof: and it shall be an habitation of dragons, and a court for owls. – Isaiah 34:13
  • The beast of the field shall honor me, the dragons and the owls: because I give waters in the wilderness, and rivers in the desert, to give drink to my people, my chosen. -  Isaiah 43:20
  • They hatch cockatrice’ eggs, and weave the spider’s web: he that eateth of their eggs dieth, and that which is crushed breaketh out into a viper. – Isaiah 59:5

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: Christianity, the Slave Religion

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, slavery, trevorblake, zine

Leviticus 27:6 and Numbers 3:15-16 make it clear that God has no problem with the death of a fetus if the fetus is less than one month old. Hosea 13:16 even has God ordering pregnant women to be “ripped up.” The Bible has some wiggle room when it comes to abortion, yet somehow the religion of the Bible, Christianity, holds that abortion is forbidden. Maybe the problem is Exodus 21:22-23, when God contradicts Himself and says if an unborn fetus is accidentally killed then the offending party should be punished. Jonathan and David have a homosexual relationship in 1 and 2 Samuel, and David is favored by God. The Bible weighs in favorably when it comes to homosexuality, yet somehow the religion of the Bible, Christianity, holds that homosexuality is forbidden. Maybe the problem is Leviticus 20:13, when God contradicts Himself and says homosexuals are to be murdered. Fortunately, there are no contradictions in the Bible when it comes to slavery. The Bible is always and only in favor of slavery – no where in the Bible is slavery spoken against, outlawed, forbidden, condemned, or otherwise presented in a negative light. Christians should concede that God contradicts Himself regarding abortion and homosexuality. They should fight for their clearly stated, God-given right to own slaves.

  • Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. – Romans 13:1
  • Servants, obey in all things your masters according to the flesh; not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God. – Colossians 3:22
  • Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme: or unto governors… – 1 Peter 2:13
  • … Then said the Lord to me, Go ye, love a woman, beloved of her friend, yet an adulteress… so I bought her… – Hosea 3:1-2
  • The Scribes and Pharises sit in Moses seat; all, therefore, whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do. – Matthew 23:2-3
  • I council thee to keep the king’s commandment… whoso keepeth the commandment shall feel no evil thing. – Ecclesiastes 8:5
  • Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall be unto his bretheren. – Genesis 9:25
  • I will sell your sons and daughters into the hands of the children of Judah, and they shall sell them to the Sabeans, to a people afar off; for the Lord hath spoken it. – Joel 3:8
  • He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised. [...] And Abraham took Ishmael his son, and all that were born in his house, and all that were bought with his money … and circumcised the flesh of their foreskin. [...] And all the men of his house, born in the house, and bought with money of the stranger, were circumcised. – Genesis 17:12-13, 23, 27
  • Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the forward. – 1 Peter 2:18
  • Let as many servants as are under your yoke count their own masters worthy of all honor, that the name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed. – 1 Timothy 6:1
  • Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ. – Ephesians 6:5
  • Exhort servants to be obedient unto their own masters, and to please them well in all things; not answering again; not purloining, but showing good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things. – Titus 2:9
  • If the priest buy any soul with his money… – Leviticus 22:11
  • And if thy brother that dwelleth by thee be waxen poor, and be sold unto thee… – Leviticus 25:39
  • And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished. Notwithstanding, if he continue a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money. – Exodus 21:20-21
  • But every man’s servant that is bought for money… – Exodus 12:44
  • If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. If he came in by himself, he shall go out by himself: if he were married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master has given him a wife, and she has born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and he shall go out by himself. And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go free: Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for ever. – Exodus 21:2-6
  • And if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye’s sake. And if he smite out his manservant’s tooth, or his maidservant’s tooth; he shall let him go free for his tooth’s sake. – Exodus 21:26-27
  • If a thief [...] have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft. – Exodus 22:2-3
  • And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. – Exodus 21:7
  • Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s… – Matthew 22:21
  • For everyone that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death. – Leviticus 20:9
  • Both thy bondsmen, and thy bondsmaids, which thou shall have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondsmen and bondsmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit them for a possession… – Leviticus 25:44-45
  • Then Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married, for he had married an Ethiopian woman. – Number 12:1

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Trevor Blake: The Flat Earth

20 August 2010 » In christianity, ovo, periodical, science, trevorblake, zine

Do Christians believe that the Earth is flat, that it does not move and that it rests on stone pillars? Do Christians believe that the flat Earth is somehow both shaped like a circle and has four corners? Do Christians believe that the sun and the moon orbit around the Earth, and that the sun can be stopped in its tracks – even made to go backwards? All of these claims are found in the Bible; do Christians believe in the Bible? If the Earth is roughly a sphere, as the evidence suggests, then it is not possible to observe all of its surface at the same time. Since the Earth is not transparent, it is also not possible for all those on its surface to directly observe the same sight at the same time. But if the Earth is flat, as claimed by the Bible, then everyone on its surface can be observed from a single vantage point and everyone on its surface can directly observe the same sight at the same time. The Bible claims all the Earth can be seen at once, a condition that could only occur if the Earth were flat. Modern science demonstrates that all claims of a flat, motionless Earth are false. But it doesn’t take modern science to reach this conclusion. Eratosthenes reached the same conclusion by observing the shadow cast down two wells at noon in two locations – over two thousand years ago. The Bible is not worth the paper it is printed on when it comes to describing the real world we all live in.

The Flat Earth Rests on a Foundation of Stone Pillars

  • He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the LORD’s, and he hath set the world upon them. 1 Samuel 2:8
  • Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations of heaven moved and shook, because he was wroth. [...] And the channels of the sea appeared, the foundations of the world were discovered at the rebuking of the LORD, at the blast of the breath of his nostrils. 2 Samuel 22:8,16
  • Fear before him, all the earth: the world also shall be stable, that it be not moved. 1 Chronicles 16:30
  • Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble. Job 9:6
  • The pillars of heaven tremble and are astonished at his reproof. Job 26:11
  • Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof. Job 38:4-6
  • Then the channels of waters were seen, and the foundations of the world were discovered at thy rebuke, O LORD, at the blast of the breath of thy nostrils. Psalms 18:15
  • The earth and all the inhabitants thereof are dissolved: I bear up the pillars of it. Selah. Psalms 75:3
  • They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course. Psalms 82:5
  • The LORD reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the LORD is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is established, that it cannot be moved. Psalms 93:1
  • Say among the heathen that the LORD reigneth: the world also shall be established that it shall not be moved: he shall judge the people righteously. Psalms 96:10
  • Who laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not be removed for ever. Psalms 104:5
  • Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD. Jeremiah 31:37
  • Hear ye, O mountains, the LORD’s controversy, and ye strong foundations of the earth: for the LORD hath a controversy with his people, and he will plead with Israel. Micah 6:2
  • And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands. Hebrews 1:10

The Flat Earth is a Disc with Four Corners

  • And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth. Isaiah 11:12
  • Also, thou son of man, thus saith the Lord GOD unto the land of Israel; An end, the end is come upon the four corners of the land. Ezekiel 7:2
  • And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. Revelation 7:1
  • It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in. Isaiah 40:22
  • Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth. Daniel 2:35
  • The tree grew, and was strong, and the height thereof reached unto heaven, and the sight thereof to the end of all the earth [...] The tree that thou sawest, which grew, and was strong, whose height reached unto the heaven, and the sight thereof to all the earth. Daniel 4:11, 20
  • Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them. Matthew 4:8
  • And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. Luke 4:5
  • Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen. Revelation 1:7

The Sun and Moon Orbit Around the Flat Earth, and Can be Stopped and Reversed in their Orbits

  • Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day. Joshuah 10:12-13
  • And Isaiah the prophet cried unto the LORD: and he brought the shadow ten degrees backward, by which it had gone down in the dial of Ahaz. 2 Kings 20:11
  • Behold, I will bring again the shadow of the degrees, which is gone down in the sun dial of Ahaz, ten degrees backward. So the sun returned ten degrees, by which degrees it was gone down. Isaiah 38:8
  • The sun and moon stood still in their habitation: at the light of thine arrows they went, and at the shining of thy glittering spear. Habakkuk 3:11

(from OVO 16 ANTICHRIST January 2006)

Anonymous: 23 Sperm Stories 23

19 August 2010 » In ovo, periodical, science, sex, sperm, zine

I THE DISCOVERY OF SPERM PART ONE
Sperm cells were first observed by van Leeuwenhoek in 1679. Van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) was a merchant and scientist from Delft, best known for improvement of the microscope and the establishment of cell biology. Using a handcrafted microscope, van Leeuwenhoek was the first to observe and describe muscles fibers, bacteria, blood flow in capillaries and spermatozoa. Van Leeuwenhoek carved over 500 optical lenses. Van Leeuwenhoek’s microscope was used and improved by Huygens for Huygens’ own investigations into microscopy.

Van Leeuwenhoek was introduced to microscopy by Huygens to observe the quality of fabrics. Van Leeuwenhoek grew interested in microscopy for its own sake and spent many nights in study and notation. The scientific language of the time was Latin but van Leeuwenhoek spoke only Dutch. Van Leeuwenhoek sent a letter to Hooke, who knew both Dutch and Latin, and Hooke instantly realized the quality and pertinence of van Leeuwenhoek’s work. Their correspondence was translated by Hooke into Latin and published in the proceeding of the Royal Society. To honor van Leeuwenhoek’s discoveries, the Dutch Royal Academy presents the van Leeuwenhoek medal to the scientist judged to have made the decade’s most significant finding in microbiology. This is regarded by microbiologists as the highest honor in their field.

Van Leeuwenhoek is thought to have been be the model for the painting titled The Geographer by van Leeuwenhoek’s friend, Vermeer. Van Leeuwenhoek also appeared on an unused design for a 10 Guilder note designed by Escher in 1951.

II THE DISCOVERY OF SPERM PART TWO
Working in the 19th Century, biochemists initially isolated DNA and RNA together from cell nuclei. They were relatively quick to appreciate the polymeric nature of their “nucleic acid” isolates, but realized only later that nucleotides were of two types – one containing ribose and the other deoxyribose. It was this subsequent discovery that led to the identification and naming of DNA as a substance distinct from RNA. Not until 1943 did Avery provide the first compelling evidence that DNA could carry genetic information.

How it could do so was unknown at the time. Because chemical dissection of DNA samples always yielded the same four nucleotides, the chemical composition of DNA appeared simple, perhaps even uniform. Organisms, on the other hand, are fantastically complex individually and widely diverse collectively. The idea that information might reside in a chemical in the same way that it exists in text – as a finite alphabet of letters arranged in a sequence of unlimited length – had not yet been conceived. It would emerge upon the discovery of DNA’s structure, but not many researchers imagined that DNA’s structure had much to say about genetics.

In the 1950s, only a few groups made it their goal to determine the structure of DNA. These included an American group led by Pauling, and two in England. At Cambridge University, Crick and Watson were building physical models using metal rods and balls, in which they incorporated the known chemical structures of the nucleotides, as well as the known position of the linkages joining one nucleotide to the next along the polymer. At King’s College, London, Wilkins and Franklin were examining x-ray diffraction patterns of DNA fibers.

A key inspiration in the work of all of these teams was the discovery in 1948 by Pauling that many proteins included helical shapes. Pauling had deduced this structure from x-ray patterns. Even in the initial crude diffraction data from DNA, it was evident that the structure involved helices. There remained questions such as how many strands came together as one, whether this number was the same for every helix, whether the bases pointed toward the helical axis or away from it, and ultimately what were the explicit angles and coordinates of all the bonds and atoms. Such questions motivated the modeling efforts of Watson and Crick.

In their attempts to model DNA, Watson and Crick restricted themselves to what they saw as chemically and biologically reasonable. A breakthrough occurred in 1952, when Chargaff visited Cambridge and inspired Crick with a description of experiments Chargaff had published in 1947. Chargaff had observed that the proportions of the four nucleotides vary between one DNA sample and the next, but that for particular pairs of nucleotides (adenine and thymine, guanine and cytosine) the two nucleotides are always present in equal proportions.

Watson and Crick had begun to contemplate double helical arrangements, and they saw that by reversing the directionality of one strand with respect to the other, they could provide an explanation for Chargaff’s puzzling finding. This explanation was the complementary pairing of the bases, which also had the effect of ensuring that the distance between the phosphate chains did not vary along a sequence. Watson and Crick were able to discern that this distance was constant, and to measure its exact size from an X-ray pattern obtained by Franklin. The same pattern also gave them the expected pitch of the helix. The pair quickly converged upon a model, which they announced before Franklin published any work on the topic. The great assistance Watson and Crick derived from Franklin’s data has become a subject of controversy, and some believe Franklin has not received due credit. The most controversial aspect is that Franklin’s critical X-ray pattern was shown to Watson and Crick without Franklin’s knowledge or permission. Wilkins showed it to them in a lab while Franklin was away.

Watson and Crick’s model attracted great interest immediately upon its presentation. Arriving at their conclusion on February 21, 1953, Watson and Crick made their first announcement on February 28. Their paper A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid was published on April 25. In an influential presentation in 1957, Crick laid out the “Central Dogma”, which foretold the relationship between DNA, RNA, and proteins, and articulated the “sequence hypothesis.” A critical confirmation of the replication mechanism that was implied by the double-helical structure followed in 1958 in the form of the Meselson-Stahl experiment. Work by Crick and coworkers deciphered the genetic code not long afterward. These findings represent the birth of molecular biology. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins were awarded a Nobel Prize in 1962, by which time Franklin had died.

III THE GENERATION OF SPERM CELLS PART ONE
Protein biosynthesis is the process in which cells build protein. The term is sometimes used to refer only to protein translation, but more often it refers to a multi-step process, beginning with transcription and ending with translation.

Transcription generates only one side of the DNA double helix. This strand is called the coding strand. The transcription starts with initiation. RNA polymerase, an enzyme, binds to a specific region on the DNA, marking the starting point, called the promoter. As the RNA polymerase binds on to the promoter, the DNA strands begin to unwind. As the RNA polymerase travels through the opposite strand to the coding strand it matches corresponding mRNA nucleotides to the DNA. The mRNA is elongated as the polymerase proceeds. This process is known as elongation. As the polymerase reaches the termination, modifications are required for the newly transcribed mRNA to be able to travel to the other parts of the cell. A cap is added to the mRNA to protect is from degradation. A poly-A tail is added on the end as a protection and template for further process.

A sperm cell is a haploid cell. Haploid cells have only one copy of each chromosome. Only reproductive cells are haploid in the higher organisms. When reproducing, haploid sex cells will generally merge. The non-haploid cells, the somatic cells, carry one copy of the chromosomes from the sperm. During translation, the message of mRNA is decoded to make proteins. Translation includes initiation, elongation, translocation, and termination. Initiation and elongation occur when the ribosome recognizes the starting codon on the mRNA strand and binds to it. The ribosome has sites which allow another enzyme, tRNA to bind to the mRNA. On tRNA, there is an anticodon that is used to match the codon on the mRNA. tRNA also has a single unit of amino acid attaches to it.

As the ribosome travels down the mRNA one codon at a time, another tRNA is attached to the mRNA at one of the ribosome site. The first tRNA is released, but the amino acid that is attached to the first tRNA is now moved to the second tRNA, and binds to that amino acid. This translocation continues and a long chain of amino acid (protein) is formed. When the entire unit reaches the end codon on the mRNA, it falls apart and a newly formed protein is released. This is the termination. Many enzymes are used to either assist or facilitate the whole procedure during this process. During and after its synthesis, a polypeptide chain begins to coil and fold spontaneously, sometimes with the assistance of chaperone proteins to assume secondary and tertiary structure. Post-translational modification may involve the formation of disulfide bridges and attachment of any of a number of biochemical functional groups, such as acetate, phosphate or various lipids or carbohydrates. Enzymes may also remove one or more amino acids from the leading (amino) end of the polypeptide chain, leading a protein made up by two polypeptide chains connected by disulfide bonds. In other cases, two or more polypeptides that are synthesized separately may join to become subunits of a protein with quaternary structure.

IV THE GENERATION OF SPERM CELLS PART TWO
Sperm is produced in the testicles; most of the remaining semenal fluid is produced by the prostate. The prostate is a gland that is part of a human’s sex organ and surrounds the tube called the urethra, located just below the bladder. A healthy prostate is approximately the size of a walnut. The urethra has two functions: to carry urine from the bladder during urination and to carry semen during ejaculation. To function properly, the prostate needs human hormones (androgens). Such hormones are responsible for human sex characteristics. The main human hormone is testosterone, which is produced by the testicles. Some human hormones are produced in small amounts by the adrenal glands. Massage of the prostate gland can be pleasurable; one way to stimulate it is through receiving anal sex.

To produce sperm, testicles need to be several degrees cooler than body temperature. If the testicles are subject to heat, sperm production temporarily stops. Immersing the testicles in hot water for a period of time each day for several weeks can result in a temporary inability to produce sperm. Pushing the testicles inside the body, tight clothing and tying the empty scrotum for a period of time also achieves this effect. In antiquity this effect was achieved by sitting on hot rocks or painting the testes with molten pitch.

V THE DEFINITION OF SPERM
A sperm cell is the human gamete. Gametes are the cells that come together during fertilization or conception in organisms that reproduce sexually. A gamete’s chromosomes are not duplicates of either of the sets of chromosomes that are carried in the somatic cells of the individual that produced the gametes. Instead, they are hybrids which are produced through the recombination or crossing over of chromosomes that takes place in the making of gametes (“meiosis”). This hybridization has a random element and every gamete a human produces the chromosomes tends to be unique.

In humans, sperm cells consists of (1) Acrosome (2) Cell membrane (3) Nucleus (4) Mitochondria (5) Tail (flagella). The acrosome develops over the anterior half of the head. It is a cap-like structure containing corrosive enzymes. The acrosome derives from the Golgi apparatus. The tail flagellates, which propels the sperm.

The sperm cell membrane (or plasma membrane) is a thin, structured layer of lipid and protein molecules that completely envelopes the cell, separating its interior from the surroundings and strictly controlling what moves in and out. In animal cells, the membrane establishes this separation alone; in yeast, bacteria and plants an additional cell wall forms the outermost boundary providing primarily mechanical support. The plasma membrane may be discerned only faintly with a transmission electron microscope.

The sperm cell nucleus is an organelle within an eukaryotic cell. Its main function is to control chemical reactions in the cell cytoplasm. The nucleus, being the largest sub-cellular compartment, varies in diameter. It is surrounded by a double membrane forming the nuclear envelope. This selectively allows molecules to enter and leave the nucleus, and separates chemical reactions taking place in cytoplasm from reactions occurring within the nucleus. The outer membrane has ribosomes. The inner and outer membrane fuse at regular spaces, forming nuclear pores.

Similar to the cytoplasm of a cell, the nucleus contains nucleoplasm: a highly viscous solid containing the chromosomes and nucleoli. Chromosones contain information encoded in DNA attached to proteins called histones arranged in to a dense network called chromatin. Nucleoli are granular structures which make ribonucleic DNA (rDNA) and assemble it with proteins.

Sperm cell mitochondra are membrane-enclosed cellular organelles. Mitochondria are distributed through the cytosol of most eukaryotic cells. Their main function is to convert the potential energy (via electron transport) of food molecules into ATP (the universal energy currency of the cell). They are composed of folds called cristae which give a much increased surface area on which chemical reactions can occur. The outer membrane encloses the entire organelle and contains channels made of protein complexes through which molecules and ions can move in and out of the mitochondrion. Large molecules are excluded from traversing this membrane. The inner membrane, folded into cristae, encloses the matrix (the internal fluid of the mitochondrion). It contains several protein complexes. Stalked particles are found on the cristae: these are the ATP synthetase enzyme molecules, which produce ATP. The intermembrane space between the two membranes contains enzymes that use ATP to phosphorylate other nucleotides and that catalyze other reactions. The word mitochondrion has the etymological root of ‘thread granule’, describing their appearnace under a microscope; tiny rod-like structures present in the cytoplasm of all cells. The matrix contains soluble enzymes that catalyze the respiration of pyruvic acid and other small organic molecules. Parts of the Krebs Cycle occur within mitochondria. The matrix also contains several copies of the mitochondrial DNA (usually 5-10 circular DNA molecules per mitochondrion), as well as special mitochondrial ribosomes, tRNAs, and proteins needed for DNA replication.

Endosymbiosis describes the situation in which one organism lives within cells of another organism. The intracellular organism is called an endosymbiont. It is also generally believed that certain organelles of eukaryotic cells, especially mitochondria and chloroplasts, originated as bacterial endosymbionts. This theory is known as the endosymbiotic hypothesis.

IV FLAGELLA
Sperm flagella are a propulsive structure used to move through a liquid medium. There are three main varieties of flagellum; the bacterial flagellum (a helical filament that rotates like a screw), archaeal flagellum (similar but nonhomologous to the bacterial flagellum), and the eukaryotic flagellum (a whip-like structure that lashes back and forth). Humans have eukaryotic flagellum.

The eukaryotic flagellum, also called a cilium or undulipodium, is completely different from the prokaryote flagella in structure and in evolutionary origin. The only characteristic that the bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic flagella have in common is that they exist outside of the cell and move to produce propulsion. A eukaryotic flagellum is a bundle of nine fused pairs of microtubules called doublets surrounding two central single microtubules (axoneme). At the base of a eukaryotic flagellum is a microtubule organizing center, called the basal body or kinetosome. The flagellum is encased within the cell’s plasma membrane, so that the interior of the flagellum is accessible to the cell’s cytoplasm. This is necessary because the flagellum’s flexing is driven by the protein dynein connecting the microtubules all along its length and forcing them to slide relative to each other, and ATP must be transported to them for them to function.

It is possible the ancestral eukaryote was a flagellate, and if not they appeared fairly early on in their development. Animals, fungi, and plants are all derived from various lines of flagellates, something reflected in the presence of flagellate cells in most forms, whose ultrastructure is a useful guide to determining relationships. Humans that consume any amount of coffee have sperm that travel faster than those who consume no coffee.

VII RNA/DNA
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) is a nucleic acid. It is structurally distinguished from DNA by the presence of an additional hydroxyl group attached to each pentose ring and functionally distinguished by its role in the transmission of genetic information from DNA (by transcription) and into protein (by translation).

RNA has 4 different bases: adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil. The first 3 bases are the same as those found in DNA, but uracil replaces thymine as the base complementary to adenine. This may be because uracil is energetically less expensive to produce, although it easily degenerates into cytosine. Thus, uracil is appropriate for RNA, where quantity is important but lifespan is not, whereas thymine is appropriate for DNA. Structurally, RNA is indistinguishable from DNA except for the critical presence of an additional hydroxyl group attached to the pentose ring. This additional group gives the molecule far greater catalytic versatility and allows it to perform reactions that DNA is incapable of performing.

A major difference between RNA and DNA is that RNA is found in the single-stranded form (an exception being the genetic material of some kinds of viruses). RNA molecules often fold into more complex structures by making use of complementary internal sequences; that is, one part of a single RNA molecule is the nucleic acid complement of another part of the same molecule (for exampls, 5′-ACUCGA-3′ and 5′-UCGAGU-3′), so that the two strands bind together. This allows the formation of hairpin loops, coils, etc., which then direct the formation of higher-order structures.

The first life on earth may have been RNA-based, due to RNA’s ability both to carry genetic information like DNA and also to catalyze biochemical reactions like enzymes. This possibility is termed the RNA world hypothesis. Even today, some viruses, such as retroviruses, use RNA as their sole genetic material. RNA is less stable than DNA, however, and is also a less efficient catalyst than a protein-based enzyme. These facts may have led to selection for reduced use of RNA in cells, and greater use of DNA and proteins.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is the primary chemical component of chromosomes and the material of which genes are made. It is sometimes called the molecule of heredity, because humans transmit copied portions of their own DNA to offspring and because in doing so they propagate their traits.

In fact, the units of DNA that reside in the nucleus of eukaryotic cells, and DNA are not single molecules. They are pairs of molecules, which entwine like vines to form a double helix. Each strand of DNA is a chemically linked chain of nucleotides, which each consist of a deoxyribose sugar, a phosphate, and one of four varieties of aromatic bases. Because DNA strands are composed of these nucleotide subunits, they are polymers. The diversity of the bases means that four distinct kinds of nucleotide exist, which are commonly referred to by the identity of their base. These are adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C), and guanine (G).

In a DNA double helix, two polynucleotide strands come together through complementary pairing of the bases, which occurs by hydrogen bonding. Each base forms hydrogen bonds readily to only one other (A to T and C to G) so that the identity of the base on one strand dictates what base must face it on the opposing strand. Thus the entire nucleotide sequence of each strand is complementary to that of the other, and when separated, each may act as a template with which to replicate the other from free nucleotides.

Because pairing causes the nucleotide bases to face the helical axis, the sugar and phosphate groups of the nucleotides run along the outside, and the two chains they form the backbones of the helix. Chemical bonds between the phosphates and the sugars that link one nucleotide to the next in the DNA strand.

When the ends of a piece of double-helical DNA are joined so that it forms a circle, as in plasmid DNA, the strands are topologically knotted. This means they cannot be separated by any process that does not involve breaking a strand. The task of unknotting topologically linked strands of DNA falls to enzymes known as topoisomerases. Some of these enzymes unknot circular DNA by cleaving two strands so that another double-stranded segment can pass through. Unknotting is required for the replication of circular DNA as well as for various types of recombination in linear DNA. The DNA helix can assume one of three slightly different geometries, of which the B form described by Watson and Crick is believed to predominate in cells. The frequency of twist (known as the helical pitch) depends largely on stacking forces that each base exerts on its neighbors in the chain.

The narrow breadth of the double helix makes it impossible to detect by conventional electron microscopy except by heavy staining. At the same time, the DNA found in many cells can be macroscopic in length. Consequently, cells must compact DNA to carry it within them. This is one of the functions of chromosomes, which contain spool-like proteins known as histones, around which DNA winds. Many molecular biological processes can induce strain. A DNA segment with excess or insufficient helical twisting is referred to, respectively, as positively or negatively super coiled. DNA typically begins by being negatively super coiled, which facilitates the unwinding of the double-helix required for RNA transcription.

The two other known double-helical forms of DNA, called A and Z, differ modestly in their geometry and dimensions. The A form appears to occur only in dehydrated samples of DNA, such those used in crystallography experiments, and possibly in hybrid pairings of DNA and RNA strands. Segments of DNA in which cells have methylated for regulatory purposes may adopt the Z geometry. In Z, the strands turn about the helical axis like a mirror image of the B form. Within a gene, the sequence of nucleotides along a DNA strand defines a protein, which an organism is liable to manufacture at one or several points in its life using the information of the sequence. The relationship between the nucleotide sequence and the amino-acid sequence of the protein is determined by simple cellular rules of translation, known collectively as the genetic code. Reading along the protein-coding sequence of a gene, each successive sequence of three nucleotides (called a codon) specifies one amino acid.

In many species of organism, only a small fraction of the total sequence of the genome appears to encode protein. The function of the rest is a matter of speculation. It is known that certain nucleotide sequences specify affinity for DNA binding proteins, which play a wide variety of vital roles, in particular through control of replication and transcription. These sequences are called regulatory sequences, and only a tiny fraction of the total that exist have been identified. Junk DNA represents sequences that do not yet appear to contain genes or to have a function.

Sequence also determines a DNA segment’s susceptibility to cleavage by restriction enzymes, the quintessential tools of genetic engineering. The position of cleavage sites throughout the genome determines a human’s DNA fingerprint.

VII XYY
XYY is a trisomy in which a human has an extra Y chromosome. The incidence of this condition is about 1 per 1000 in humans. Other than being slightly taller and having more severe acne than normal, XYY humans are not significantly different from most humans. Studies suggesting that there were more XYY humans incarcerated than chance would suggest have been determined to be procedurally flawed.

IX THE FUNCTION OF SPERM PART ONE
Sperm is carried in a fluid called semen. Semen is a whitish fluid containing water and small amounts of salt, protein, and fructose sugar, and is in itself harmless on the skin or when ingested. Semen can be the vehicle for many sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Contact with the semen of a human infected with HIV should be avoided, even by persons already infected with the virus.

At the time of orgasm, semen is ejected through the urethra of the penis. When a human is sexually excited, a small amount of a clear fluid (pre-ejaculate) may leak out of the penis before orgasm and ejaculation. This pre-ejaculate fluid may also contain sperm. In 1997 the British Medical Journal reported that humans that had the highest frequency of orgasms had half the death rate of those with the least frequency of orgasms. Orgasms have also been linked to an increased sense of smell, reduction of heart disease, weight loss, overall fitness, reduction of depression, pain relief, a lessening occurrence of flues and colds, better bladder control, greater prostate health and better teeth. Since semen contains zinc, calcium and other minerals known to reduce tooth decay, ingestion of sperm can be considered a healthy dietary supplement. According to a June 2002 article in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, sperm acts as an antidepressant. Dr. Gallup administered the Beck Depression Inventory to 293 subjects on their sexual activities and happiness. The results, confirmed by a second clinical trial of 700 subjects, suggest that subjects who take in sperm are happier, on average, than those whose do not. Access to sperm also appears to lead to more sexual activity: this may be caused by the testosterone and prostaglandin E1 found in sperm.

X THE FUNCTION OF SPERM PART TWO
Reports of alien abduction often include claims of the harvesting of or depositing of sperm. The Christian religion claims that when a sperm cell enters another kind of cell, a soul is created. Castaneda (a 20th Century novelist), claimed that sperm went to the recipient’s brain, causing a pleasant sensation. Bardon (a 20th Century occultist) claimed that retaining sperm in a special container called a condenser could allow the manipulation of energy and magnetic fluid. The Temple ov Psychick Youth claimed that placing sperm on paper while concentrating on a desired goal would make that desired goal occur. The religion of Islam claims that sperm is produced ‘between the backbone and the ribs,’ and that all kinds of humans generate sperm.

XI THE FUNCTION OF SPERM PART THREE
A majority of the world’s economy, technological progress, art and culture are centered on extracting sperm from one or more human and putting it inside of or in proximity to one or more other humans or images. The second most active engine of the world’s economy, technological effort, art and culture is the prevention of these activities. The entire history of humanity can be explained as the dynamics of these two forces.

Some of the genetic information known to be found in Neanderthals and other early contemporaries with humans is found in sperm. This is true not only in the sense of the trunk of evolution being visible in each of its branches, but in the sense of genetic information found specifically in Neanderthals being found in human sperm – a bending-back of the branch. It is likely that humans and Neanderthals shared a common ancestor, and then Neanderthals were absorbed (in part) back into the human branch of evolution. Some humans exhibit these Neanderthal traits more strongly than others, but no claim is made that they are more Neanderthal than others.

XII THE FUNCTION OF SPERM PART FOUR
Ownership of sperm is increasingly contested in the legal sphere. Sperm donated to a clinic Illinois in 1990 was screened for the disease cystic fibrosis. This sperm was used to create three humans. The sperm donor and the subject knew they had the gene for cystic fibrosis, and therefore sought outside sperm to limit the chance their created human would have this disease. But the sperm screening was ineffective, and one of the created humans had cystic fibrosis. In 1996 a subject in Florida sought sperm to create a human. The subject found a sperm donor, but was not told that the sperm donor was the physician conducting the operation. The subject sued the physician for not using the sperm that the subject wanted to be used. In 1998 a young human died in a game of ‘Russian Roulette.’ The human’s sperm was harvested and frozen until such time as a new human could be created based on the dead human’s sperm. In 1999 a subject in Prague tricked a human into donating sperm to a local sperm bank with the claim this was part of a medical process. The subject actually used the sperm to create two new humans, which the donor human was then was required by to financially support the created humans. In 2002 a human in Sweden was asked by two subjects to donate sperm so they could create humans. When the two subjects parted ways, the courts ruled that the donor human was the legal guardian and was required by to financially support the created humans. Also in 2002, a subject in Japan used sperm from the subject’s dead human partner to create new humans. The courts did not, however, recognize the dead sperm donor as the parent of the created human: this created human is defined by law as having only one biological parent. But in 2003 a subject in North Queensland was denied access to the sperm of the subject’s dead partner.

XIII SPERMETAMORPHOSIS
Hymenoepimecis Ichneumondiae is a variety of wasp that has an unusual control over the physiology and behavior of a variety of spider known as Plesiometra Argyra Araneidae. The spider normally spins a web made of sticky spirals, but under the influence of the wasp it spins a completely different sort of web. The wasp stings the spider while the spider is in its web, causing temporary paralysis. The wasp then deposits a cell on the spider and leaves. The cell develops into a larvae. The spider recovers and goes on building and maintaining its web as it had before, while the larval wasp feeds on the haemolymph (blood) of the spider. The sting of the wasp and the feeding of the larvae influence the behavior of the spider. One or two weeks later, when the larva is about to moult, the spider spins a web consisting of four strands supporting a central cocoon. This sort of web is entirely without function for the spider; it does not offer protection nor does it gather food. But when the larva moults, kills and eats the spider, it is a perfect temporary home for the new wasp.

Myxobolous Cerebralis is parasite found in some cold water fish. The parasite is not found exclusively in fish, however, and in fact it depends on other species for the completion of its life cycle. In the first part of its life cycle, the parasite is released from the bodies of infected fish. At this stage the parasite is a spore which can survive drought, freezing and other adverse conditions for decades. The spore enters the second phase of its life cycle when it enters tubifex worms, where it grows into the form that infect fish.

The parasite is released by the worms and enter the bodies of fish through their skin, where it becomes lodged in the fish’s spinal column and nervous system. This is the third stage of the parasite’s life cycle. During this stage, the physiology and behavior of fish changes: the fish grows deformities that make it more visible from the air, and it begins to whirl and thrash near the water’s surface. In the fourth stage of the parasite’s life cycle, the fish (now a highly visible target for aerial predators) are consumed by birds. The parasite passes through the bird’s digestive tract and is returned to the water in a new location by the bird’s fecal matter. At this point the parasite returns to the first stage in its life cycle.

Humans can put sperm in each other and in subjects. Dramatic physiological and behavioral changes can result from this exchange, including (in some cases) the creation of new humans. These newly generated humans sometimes contain sperm cells, and so the human life cycle may continue. No human has ever been generated without sperm: sperm is the agent of all life, and that which is outside of life is the inorganic.

XIV THE PENIS PART ONE
The penis (plural penises or penes) or phallus is the copulatory organ, and, in mammals, the organ of urinary excretion. The sexual organs comprise both the penis and the testes. The penis is capable of erection for use in sexual intercourse. The human penis differs from some other mammalian penises in lacking an erectile bone (instead relying entirely on engorgement with blood to reach its erect state), lacking the ability to be withdrawn into the groin, and being larger than average in proportion to body mass.

The human penis is built of three columns of erectile tissue: the two corpora cavernosa and one corpus spongiosum which lies below them. The end of corpus spongiosum is enlarged and cone-shaped and forms the glans penis. The glans supports the foreskin or prepuce, a loose fold of skin that can retract to expose the glans. It aids in sexual insertion, keeps the glans moist and provides a gliding action which is said to increase sexual pleasure. For various cultural, religious, and (more rarely) medical reasons, the foreskin is sometimes partly or completely removed; this is called circumcision. The area on the underside of the penis, where the foreskin attaches, is called the frenum. The inner portion of the foreskin near the sulcus is a highly innervated area known as the ridged band. Removal of the foreskin by circumcision also usually removes the ridged band and injures or removes the frenulum.

The urethra, which is the last part of the urinary tract, traverses the corpus spongiosum and its end lies on the tip of the glans penis. It is both a passage for urine and for the ejaculation of semen. Sperm is produced in the testes and stored in the attached epididymis. During ejaculation, sperm are propelled up the vas deferens, two ducts that pass over and behind the bladder. Fluids are added by the seminal vesicles and the vas deferens turns into the ejaculatory ducts which join the urethra inside the prostate gland. The prostate as well as the bulbourethral glands add further secretions, and the semen is expelled through the penis.

XV THE PENIS PART TWO
An erection is the hardening, enlarging and rising of the penis which often occurs in the sexually aroused human. In addition to sexual arousal, erections can be caused by friction or by the pressure of the filled urinary bladder. In humans, erections occur several times per night during sleep, and morning erections are common.

Physiologically, an erection is achieved by two mechanisms: increased inflow of blood into the vessels of erectile tissue, and decreased outflow. After a signal from the sympathetic nervous system, muscles in the region relax, allowing more blood to enter the sponge-like tissues. Contraction of other muscles reduce the outflow. The enlarged structure then exerts pressures on the exit vein, further reducing the outflow. As blood flows in, the penis stiffens, its girth and length increases, and it rises to an angle that can vary from horizontal to almost vertical. Normally, the foreskin retracts and exposes the glans. Erections may occur even during or after death, if the pressure within the penis increases for some reason.

XVI THE PENIS PART THREE
In comparison to body size, the human penis is among the largest of the primates. The average human penis is less than the span of a human hand in length when fully engorged with blood during arousal. The size of a flaccid human penis varies in both length and width in ways that often do not predict the size of a fully aroused member. A human with a relatively small flaccid penis may have an above average length penis when fully aroused. The opposite is also true.

The most common form of penile body modification is the practice of circumcision. Less commonly, the penis is pierced and modified by other body art. Piercings of the penis include the Prince Albert piercing, the Apadravya piercing, the Ampallang piercing, the dido piercing, the frenum piercing and others. Apart from a penectomy, the most radical of these is the subincision, in which the glans penis is bifurcated to look similar to that of the kangaroo. This modification was originally done among Australian Aborigines, although it is now done by some in the U.S. and Europe. A small number of humans who are circumcised attempt to restore their foreskin through surgical and other means. This is called foreskin restoration.

XVII THE FUTURE OF SPERM PART ONE
Stem cells are human cells that can be manipulated into becoming other types of cells, and this includes (in theory) sperm cells. Dr Lacham-Kaplan of Monash University in Melbourne successfully created mice without mouse sperm in 1991. Scientists at the Reproductive Genetics Institute in Chicago created a means of creating new humans without sperm in 2002.

This research also opens the possibility of elimination of genetic flaws in humanity at the point of creation, thereby reducing a great deal of human suffering and expense. What is more, better humans can be created – humans able to live longer, healthier lives in a greater variety of environments with less reliance on outside resources.

Efforts to create better humans through manipulation of sperm have already been carried out. In 1989 a study by Wille and Beier compared 99 surgically castrated sex offenders and 35 non-castrated sex offenders ten years after their release from prison. The recidivism rate of castrated offenders was 3%, while the rate for non-castrated offenders was 46%.

Sperm count differs by geographical region. In the United States, New Yorkers issue 102.9 x 100000/mL sperm, Los Angeles humans issue 80.8 x 100000/mL, and Columbia (Missouri) humans issue only an average 53.5 x 100000/mL sperm.

A study conducted in 1999 by The Lancet suggested that out of 650 humans who were unable to create new humans, 20 had been exposed to high levels of pesticides. Information gathered between 1938 and 1990 suggests sperm densities in the United States have an average annual decrease of 1.5 million sperm/mL of collected sample, or about 1.5 percent per year. European sperm has declined at about twice that rate (3.1%/year). As the inability to create new humans increases so does the need to manufacture artificial sperm. In contrast, the bdelloid rotifer has evolved into 370 species over fifty million years: clearly, the need to reproduce with sperm is an option and not a requirement. In 1967, Surveyor 3 landed on the moon. The bacteria Streptococcus mitis was accidentally on board placed there by the sneeze of a NASA worker. The bacteria survived liftoff, space travel, a lack of atmosphere, a lack of food, and three years of cosmic radiation on the surface of the moon. A component of Surveyor 3 was returned to Earth in 1969 by astronaut Conrad, where it was discovered that the bacteria was still alive. In 1997, Cano recovered living bacteria found in the stomach of a bee preserved in amber thirty million years ago.

XVIII THE FUTURE OF SPERM PART TWO
Humans are a sperm’s way of making more sperm, until such inevitable time as we can make our replacements.

(from OVO 15 Sperm February 2005)

Thom Metzger: The Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man

19 August 2010 » In ovo, periodical, sperm, zine

Whilom – when God did ordain
to claim this drear and waste domain
Him did it please to bid His saints
against all pleading abject ‘plaints
to sojourn here ‘cross cruel sea
to raise the cross for all to see.

A thousand beasts with blood-damp chins
ten thousand gibb’ring indians
a frozen land, a ruthless sky
brought bitter tear to every eye.
But something more ill bowered here
to breed in saints a holy fear.

No savage mur’drous picaroon
nor dire eclipses of the moon
nor leons nor leviathans
nor vandal hordes nor heathen huns
did cause more quailing terror than
the Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

Some swore this wight was naught but air
which issueth from serpent’s lair.
And others claim’d the visions vile
were nauseous fumes, telluric bile.
Still others laughed the thought away,
yet did he haunt and hunt his prey.

An hundred years passed now apace
sith saints had conquered this new place;
an hundred years did roll away
now commonwealth in its heyday
grew fattish, vain, wax’d like the moon
which to a sliver withers soon.

To things of faith, to hymn and prayer,
these follied folk gave not a care.
Most shamefully young wives and girles
loved more their ribands and their pearls.
So watched each Sarah, Jane and Nan:
the Hypmogoogoopizin’ man.

Whence this monstrous permutation,
in what womb his generation?
Was he born into this world,
or from a passing comet hurled?
Will the secret pages yield
or is his tome forever sealed?

Was he spawn of Lapland witch
or the whelp of slav’ring bitch
mated moonwise, or the get
of mumbo-jumbo, black as jet,
of Pictish priest bedaubed with woad
or was an egg his first abode?

Slithered he from burst cocoon
in the lea of drifting dune,
was eye on Ancient Pyramid
witness to his birth, or did
he live before time began,
this Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man?

Now hear the dread particulars
of happ’nings ‘neath malefic stars
how goodly maid by name of Kate
fell, and falling, sealed her fate.
Of disobedience and its pain,
of sin’s black touch and seeping stain.

Creeping, spavined, skin and bone
came to Kate a neighbor crone.
She dreweth forth aweighty book
and sheweth for a fleety look
a picture there, an image of
woeful, grievous, gorgonic love.

Tho’ Kate drew back to shield her eye
she gave a grue, a mewling cry;
too late, too late, this ancient art
had hooked its talons in her heart.
So came from damned Alcoran
the Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

She juddered, blenched, nigh to swooning,
tho’ all was still, she heard his crooning,
a far-off bruit, as hounds to stag
a closer clamor did make her swag
and hand grew weak, and pulse did race
to see that lewdly leering face.

She sent away the cackling hag
yet slumber’d not, her bed a quag.
The moon arose, refulgent globe,
while Kate a comely female Job,
lay drenched in sweat, a writhing wretch
first fetal, closed, then wild outstretched.

The watchman heard the bandog howl
the wauling cat and hooty owl;
the leaves on ancient oak tree limbs
quivered, chanting ghostly hymns
to him, the Laird of demon clan:
the Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

When next did Phoebus slow descend
cry’d piteous Kate – O Lord forfend!
preserve, protect, this palsy’d girle
who feeleth banners dire unfurl,
keep hence the black and shining one
whose eye doth glister like the sun.

But all was vain and once again
a preternatural darkness came,
an ague clutch’d her, held her close
infernal trumpets, grandiose,
played fanfares only she could hear
to bold proclaim her time was near.

And sitting up in clammy bed
as fiendish tabors beat her head
she saw, tho’ eyes were closed fast
she saw, tho’ heartsick and aghast
she saw, and soul was clove in twain
the Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

Prodigious and malevolent
a baleful sign, a fell portent,
a louring look, a gravid eye,
the optick spheroid loomed nigh,
The fevered orb which streamed with rays
now trammeled her in noisome gaze.

Tho’ mummy-wound in dampish sheets,
she rose and fell in heaving heats.
The bedshrouds all were burned away
as dew on dawn of summer’s day.
Invading deep his vision darts
pierced arm and leg and tender parts.

So to complete his carnal crime -
as in creation’s natal time,
when Adam saw his naked Eve,
and swift as thought to her did cleave -
likewise this cruel panopticon,
this Hypmogoogoopizin’ man.

Then from the Great Afflicting eye
came a voice to mollify,
to stroke heartstrings as seraphim
which harp in heaven plangent hymn.
And so from bed did Kate arise
and walk beneath the starry skies.

Her sleeping dress yet fell away
and went she in sky-clad array.
Above her sable welkin arch’d
while through the weeds and woods she marched
condemned yet fervent, so it seemed
to mount the scaffold of her dreams.

The twin globes glowed, a lure for she,
like as a sundered Gemini.
The lunar orb and lustful eye
were side by side, in harmony,
febrile, limpid, hot and wan:
this Hypmogoogoopizin’ man.

just once at Midnight’s tolling bell
she shivered, wrestling off the spell,
rebelling, brief, she fought and lost
resisting him, at what a cost.
Pinches, mischiefs, sundry bite
were her reward for bootless fight.

So anon she reached the place
where Kate completeth her disgrace.
A massy oak, black as the tomb,
above her, vast and sere it loomed,
and from a branch hangeth a rope
and from this hang’d the death of hope.

For there it was now twelve years gone
another girle at crack of dawn
was found dependent, lifeless fruit
above the writhing, snaky root,
her death the work of artisan
call’d Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

The eye’s refulgence trebled as
an husband’s ardor when it has
been rebuffed and thrice denied
by winsome, teazing furtive bride,
and to the virgin marriage bed
he speeds, and soon is daubed red.

The girle took hold of ragged noose
and placed it ’round her throte yet loose
then sudden skirling music came
of pipes and nakers to inflame
her writhing self, and so she danced
his odalisque, fawning, entranced.

Afflicted thus, this serpentine
and bestial spree, this jig malign
roiled outward from her ‘sorceled loins
as incubus with sleeper joins
and so continued damn’d pavan
with Hypmogoogoopizin’ man.

And keenly now, Kate chanted back
a descant tune demoniack.
Deep from her issueth the song:
a thousand echoes from a gong
that hangs within the citadel
of dankest, drearest deepest Hell.

The rope withal did tight enclose
and pulled her up upon her toes.
She dangled wailing pagan psalms
obeisant blessing and salaams
to Pasha of Opthalmick love,
and all the attributes thereof.

Gasping, grasping now for him,
dependent there from oaken limb,
the base lubricious undulation
naked blasphemous flirtations,
in manner of a courtesan
for Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

He swelled, and swollen, eldritch sparks
as those which shot from ancient ark
that Israel did hold so dear -
commanding total awe and fear -
billow’d, thunder’d, flashed and roar’d
with the presence of the Lord.

Or as a comet blots the skies
and the heathen terrifies
a blinding omen, mark of doom,
from the blackness closer looms
so did the eye most fulgurous
wax as rakeshame nemesis.

Sphering round this lesser sun,
circumscribed oblivion,
stretched taut, a membrane like a drum
head, spotless, weightless, pure vellum
comprised the girth of glaring gland,
of Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

As man o’ war with heavy ordnance
doth pound his foe to make her dance,
blasting cannon, hail of shot,
ball and bullet, crimson hot,
in such wise did her suitor
cruelly vex and persecute her.

She took the salvoes and she shook
twisted on this angler’s hook.
Raptured, ravished, did she squirm,
stript and moist, a wanton worm,
bait to catch most precious game
yet fish and fisher were the same.

Choked at end of hempen cord
blessing him ‘gainst whom she warr’d,
- an hour ago or eons past
across a space ungodly vast -
Kate surrendered to all demands
of Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

With fervent cry she yielded all,
capitulated to the call
submitted to her whilom foe
taking cruel bastinado
flung wide back her blissom limbs
and opened self to welcome him.

The instant rupture paroxysm
flooding ocular baptism
bursting eye, deluging rheum
vitreous matter, flooding spume,
bubbling gouts of ectoplasm
exploded forth in spewy spasm.

Steaming jets of gleaming gleet
boiling with supernal heat,
sweet and grievous, grumey glair
roar’d in torrents through the air,
in an instant all to drain
the Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

So quickly did her anointment
daub her all with shining ointment
honey bast’d, rare sweetmeat,
golden glaz’d with sugar sleet,
so sudden was she complete bedew’d
she hang’d in gravid hebetude.

And spectral leman too was sated
in this manner to be mated.
Egg and sperm in one fluid
like potations of the Druid
or the fabled Alkahest
which Gothick wizard possess’d.

So the climax of their love,
he below and she above,
bedizened with his dripping jewels
while at her feet the ichor pools,
so it ends as it began,
with Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

But hold – tho both are spent, agog,
yet there is an epilogue.
Kate against all hope did live
and of these circumstances give
her testimony, wild and queer,
blist’ring every list’ning ear.

She waxed old and oft retold
her tale in tongue surprizing bold.
Her inmost soul was stung by pride
to be the chosen wanton bride,
the one whose consecrated coney
was surfeited with radiant honey.

Did she bear his heinous child?
Was her matrix so defiled?
Slunk she off to do the birth?
Did their bastard walk the earth?
No one knoweth other than
the Hypmogoogoopizin’ Man.

(from OVO 15 Sperm February 2005)